A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg

被引:0
作者
John Kuruvilla
Cheng-Hwai Tzeng
Seok-Goo Cho
Seok Jin Kim
Jih-Luh Tang
Yaming Su
Jingyang Wu
Rita Vargo
Peter Cheverton
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Cancer Centre,
[2] Taipei Veterans General Hospital,undefined
[3] Catholic Medical Centre St Mary’s Hospital,undefined
[4] Samsung Medical Centre,undefined
[5] National Taiwan University Hospital,undefined
[6] Sanofi Oncology,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2019年 / 54卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A randomized, multicenter, open-label study explored the effect of a fixed-dose (FD) of plerixafor versus the approved weight-based (WB) dose for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and a body weight of ≤70 kg. After mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 μg/kg/day for 4 days, patients were randomized 1:1 to either plerixafor FD 20 mg (n = 30) or WB 0.24 mg/kg (n = 31) on the evening of Day 4. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in ≤4 days of apheresis, and total systemic exposure to plerixafor (area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 10 h [AUC0–10]). There was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients attaining the primary efficacy endpoint (60% FD arm, 55% WB arm; P = 0.395). Exposure to plerixafor was greater in the FD arm relative to the WB arm; however, there was no appreciable difference regarding fold increases of peripheral blood CD34+ cells. The safety profile was similar between treatment groups. These results suggest there is no statistically significant difference in HSC mobilization with a standard WB dosing regimen of plerixafor plus G-CSF in patients with low body weight compared with an FD regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:258 / 264
页数:6
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Philip T(1995)Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma N Engl J Med 333 1540-5
[2]  
Guglielmi C(2011)Impact of the use of autologous stem cell transplantation at first relapse both in naive and previously rituximab exposed follicular lymphoma patients treated in the GELA/GOELAMS FL2000 study Haematologica 96 1128-35
[3]  
Hagenbeek A(2013)Relapsed and refractory aggressive NHL: time for a change Transfus Apher Sci 49 72-9
[4]  
Somers R(2013)Indications for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma: a consensus project of the EBMT-Lymphoma Working Party Haematologica 98 1014-21
[5]  
Van der Lelie H(2014)Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: consensus guidelines and recommendations Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 20 295-308
[6]  
Bron D(2015)Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 26 116-25
[7]  
Le Gouill S(2015)Peripheral T-cell lymphomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 26 108-15
[8]  
De Guibert S(2016)The role of autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the management of indolent B-cell lymphoma Blood 127 2093-100
[9]  
Planche L(2007)Patients mobilizing large numbers of CD34 Bone Marrow Transplant 40 437-41
[10]  
Brice P(2004) cells (‘super mobilizers’) have improved survival in autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoid malignancies Stem Cells Dev 13 598-606