Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) as primary and secondary outcomes in total hip and knee arthroplasty randomized controlled trials: a systematic review

[1] Alghadir AH(2018)Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain J Pain Res 11 851-856

[2] Anwer S(2012)The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure J Arthroplasty 27 430-436.e431

[3] Iqbal A(1988)Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol 15 1833-1840

[4] Iqbal ZA(2020)Preferred outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials of total knee replacement rehabilitation: a systematic review PM R 12 706-713

[5] Behrend H(2013)What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme Health Qual Life Outcomes 11 128-419

[6] Giesinger K(2015)Evaluating pain in orthopedic patients: can the visual analog scale be used as a long-term outcome instrument? J Pain Relief 12 416-714

[7] Giesinger JM(1997)Visual analog scale for the assessment of total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 481 702-80

[8] Kuster MS(2023)Discordance abounds in minimum clinically important differences in THA: a systematic review Clin Orthop Relat Res 481 63-208

[9] Bellamy N(2023)There are considerable inconsistencies among minimum clinically important differences in TKA: a systematic review Clin Orthop Relat Res 107 199-614

[10] Buchanan WW(2021)The ceiling effects of patient reported outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 16 605-1035.e1023

[1] Alghadir AH(2018)Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain J Pain Res 11 851-856

[2] Anwer S(2012)The “forgotten joint” as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure J Arthroplasty 27 430-436.e431

[3] Iqbal A(1988)Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol 15 1833-1840

[4] Iqbal ZA(2020)Preferred outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials of total knee replacement rehabilitation: a systematic review PM R 12 706-713

[5] Behrend H(2013)What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme Health Qual Life Outcomes 11 128-419

[6] Giesinger K(2015)Evaluating pain in orthopedic patients: can the visual analog scale be used as a long-term outcome instrument? J Pain Relief 12 416-714

[7] Giesinger JM(1997)Visual analog scale for the assessment of total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 481 702-80

[8] Kuster MS(2023)Discordance abounds in minimum clinically important differences in THA: a systematic review Clin Orthop Relat Res 481 63-208

[9] Bellamy N(2023)There are considerable inconsistencies among minimum clinically important differences in TKA: a systematic review Clin Orthop Relat Res 107 199-614

[10] Buchanan WW(2021)The ceiling effects of patient reported outcome measures for total knee arthroplasty Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 16 605-1035.e1023