Normalization of the Indirect Measurement Errors of Acceptance Engine Tests

被引:0
作者
O. A. Leonov
N. Zh. Shkaruba
机构
[1] Russian State Agrarian University,
[2] Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy,undefined
来源
Measurement Techniques | 2022年 / 65卷
关键词
measurement error; acceptance tests; indirect measurements; quality of measurements; permissible error; marginal error; normalization of permissible error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article discusses the issues of ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the measurement results of controlled engine parameters during acceptance tests. GOST 18509-88 “Tractor and combine diesel engines. Bench test method” establishes the permissible errors of the main controlled parameters of engines during acceptance tests; however, no requirements hold for the permissible error in engine power measurements. On the basis of probability theory, an equation was derived for calculating power measurement errors, and the permissible measurement errors (according to GOST 18509-88) in the power measurements of overhauled engines of various brands were calculated. A comparative analysis of these calculated results and the actual error in measuring power during running-in on the stands KI-5274, KI-5540M, KI-5541M, KI-542M, and KI-2118A of the Russian Scientific Research Technological Institute for the Repair and Operation of the Machine and Tractor Park of the Russian Agricultural Academy was performed. This comparison established that the power measurement errors exceed the maximum allowable values. Recommendations were developed for calculating acceptance windows with a shift relative to the nominal power value to improve the veracity of power control results. The limiting errors in measuring the power of engines of various brands and acceptance limits were calculated depending on the required reliability. This methodology increases the veracity of control results at the acceptance test stage of an overhauled engine.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 568
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
Prokopov AV(2005)On the correctness of the representation of the values of quantities and indicators of the accuracy of the results of indirect measurements Meas. Tech. 48 346-351
[2]  
Sobolev VI(2006)undefined Meas. Tech. 49 652-656
[3]  
Eremin EV(2020)undefined Meas. Tech. 64 15-22
[4]  
Erokhin MN(2021)undefined Russ. Eng. Res. 40 726-731
[5]  
Leonov OA(2021)undefined Russ. Eng. Res. 41 211-214
[6]  
Shkaruba NZh(2019)undefined Pribory, No. 9 46-54
[7]  
Golinitskiy PV(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Antonova UYu(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Shkaruba NZ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Leonov OA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined