Microsurgery of residual or recurrent complex intracranial aneurysms after coil embolization – a quest for the ultimate therapy

被引:0
作者
Ariyan Pirayesh
Nakao Ota
Kosumo Noda
Ioannis Petrakakis
Hiroyasu Kamiyama
Sadahisa Tokuda
Rokuya Tanikawa
机构
[1] Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital,Department of Neurosurgery
来源
Neurosurgical Review | 2021年 / 44卷
关键词
Aneurysm recurrence; Bypass; Endovascular treatment; Intracranial aneurysm; Microsurgical clipping; Residual aneurysm;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The long-term stability of coil embolization (CE) of complex intracranial aneurysms (CIAs) is fraught with high rates of recanalization. Surgery of precoiled CIAs, however, deviates from a common straightforward procedure, demanding sophisticated strategies. To shed light on the scope and limitations of microsurgical re-treatment, we present our experiences with precoiled CIAs. We retrospectively analysed a consecutive series of 12 patients with precoiled CIAs treated microsurgically over a 5-year period, and provide a critical juxtaposition with the literature. Five aneurysms were located in the posterior circulation, 8 were large-giant sized, 5 were calcified/thrombosed. One presented as a dissecting-fusiform aneurysm, 9 ranked among wide neck aneurysms. Eight lesions were excluded by neck clipping (5 necessitating coil extraction); 1 requiring adjunct CE. The dissecting-fusiform aneurysm was resected with reconstruction of the parent artery using a radial artery graft. Three lesions were treated with flow alteration (parent artery occlusion under bypass protection). Mean interval coiling-surgery was 4.6 years (range 0.5–12 years). Overall, 10 aneurysms were successfully excluded; 2 lesions treated with flow alteration displayed partial thrombosis, progressing over time. Outcome was good in 8 and poor in 4 patients (2 experiencing delayed neurological morbidity), and mean follow-up was 24.3 months. No mortality was encountered. Microsurgery as a last resort for precoiled CIAs can provide—in a majority of cases—a definitive therapy with good outcome. Since repeat coiling increases the complexity of later surgical treatment, we recommend for this subgroup of aneurysms a critical evaluation of CE as an option for re-treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1051
页数:20
相关论文
共 388 条
[1]  
Molyneux AJ(2005)International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion Lancet 366 809-817
[2]  
Kerr RS(2007)Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Stroke 38 1538-1544
[3]  
Yu LM(2003)Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils Stroke 34 1398-1403
[4]  
Clarke M(2008)Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study Stroke 39 120-125
[5]  
Sneade M(2015)Microsurgical treatment of previously coiled intracranial aneurysms: systematic review of the literature World Neurosurg 84 246-253
[6]  
Yarnold JA(2012)Management of residual and recurrent aneurysms after initial endovascular treatment Neurosurgery 70 537-553
[7]  
Sandercock P(1995)Neurosurgical management of cerebral aneurysms following unsuccessful or incomplete endovascular embolization J Neurosurg 83 843-853
[8]  
Campi A(2015)Safety and efficacy of microsurgical treatment of previously coiled aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis Acta Neurochir 157 1623-1632
[9]  
Ramzi N(2019)Management of residual and recurrent aneurysms after clipping or coiling: clinical characteristics, treatments, and follow-up outcomes World Neurosurg 122 e838-e846
[10]  
Molyneux AJ(1996)Aneurysm clipping after endovascular treatment with coils: a report of eight patients Neurosurgery 38 955-960