Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members

被引:0
|
作者
Johanna Kopp
Regine Gerike
Kay W. Axhausen
机构
[1] ETH Zurich,Institute for Transport Planning and Systems (IVT)
[2] University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna,Institute for Transport Studies
来源
Transportation | 2015年 / 42卷
关键词
Free-floating car-sharing; Travel behaviour; Modal split; Multimodality; GPS tracking;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Characteristics of users and usage of station-based car-sharing services have been discussed in various studies. First analyses of the free-floating car-sharing model DriveNow have shown that member composition and patterns of use are not very different from those of station-based car-sharing schemes. Nevertheless, free-floating car-sharing members were drawn from a new pool of travellers, they were not attracted by existing station-based car-sharing schemes. This paper goes beyond these analyses and looks not only at the usage of car-sharing services but at the overall travel behaviour of free-floating car-sharing members (FFCS). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the specifics of this travel behaviour have been analysed based on substantial data that was collected specifically for this purpose with an innovative survey design based on a GPS tracking smartphone application. The goal of this study is to contrast the core group of members of the free-floating car-sharing model DriveNow (male, 25-45 years old) with people who do not use car-sharing. Key travel indicators are compared for FFCS and non-car-sharers (NCS) with a special emphasis on type and extend of multimodal travel behaviour within those two groups. The results show higher trip frequency for FFCS and differences in mode choice pattern. FFCS are more intermodal and multimodal in their behaviour. Shares of cycling are significantly higher, shares of private car trips are significantly lower for FFCS compared to NCS. The insights gained in this study can help cities and car-sharing operators to develop framework conditions and services that optimally integrate free-floating car-sharing services into the overall urban transport systems.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 469
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] Exploiting free-floating car sharing rewards to support a free year of daily commute
    Zaballa, Eder Ollora
    20TH IEEE MEDITERRANEAN ELETROTECHNICAL CONFERENCE (IEEE MELECON 2020), 2020, : 93 - 98
  • [22] Incorporating free-floating car-sharing into an activity-based dynamic user equilibrium model: A demand-side model
    Li, Qing
    Liao, Feixiong
    Timmermans, Harry J. P.
    Huang, Haijun
    Zhou, Jing
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2018, 107 : 102 - 123
  • [23] A multi-faceted characterization of free-floating car sharing service usage
    Giordano, Danilo
    Vassio, Luca
    Cagliero, Luca
    Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 125
  • [24] A multi-faceted characterization of free-floating car sharing service usage
    Giordano, Danilo
    Vassio, Luca
    Cagliero, Luca
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 125
  • [25] User-based relocation strategy for free floating car-sharing system: An Istanbul case
    Simsir, Misra
    Yildirim, U. Mahir
    Sen, Doruk
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2024, 30 (07): : 934 - 943
  • [26] Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber: Who are the shared mobility users and where do they live?
    Mouratidis, Kostas
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 86
  • [27] Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber: Who are the shared mobility users and where do they live?
    Mouratidis, Kostas
    Sustainable Cities and Society, 2022, 86
  • [28] Energy, environmental and mobility impacts of car-sharing systems. Empirical results from Lisbon, Portugal
    Baptista, Patricia
    Melo, Sandra
    Rolim, Catarina
    TRANSPORTATION: CAN WE DO MORE WITH LESS RESOURCES? - 16TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION - PORTO 2013, 2014, 111 : 28 - 37
  • [29] Will good public transport substitute free-floating car sharing? A case study from Copenhagen
    Ingvardson, Jesper Blafoss
    Weisshaar, Maresa
    Rich, Jeppe
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2023, 12
  • [30] Prioritisation of modelling parameters of a free-floating car sharing system according to their sensitivity to the environmental impacts
    Guyon, Olivier
    Millet, Dominique
    Garcia, Julien
    Margni, Manuele
    Richet, Sophie
    Tchertchian, Nicolas
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 296