Agreement between diurnal variations of intraocular pressure by Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients on topical anti-glaucoma medication

被引:0
作者
Shikha Gupta
Gautam Sinha
Reetika Sharma
Bhagabat Nayak
Bharat Patil
Bibhuti Kashyap
Abdul Shameer
Tanuj Dada
机构
[1] All India Institute of Medical Sciences,Dr Rajendra Prasad Center for Ophthalmic Sciences
[2] All India Institute of Medical Sciences,Dr Rajendra Prasad Center for Ophthalmic Sciences
来源
International Ophthalmology | 2016年 / 36卷
关键词
Glaucoma; Goldmann applanation; Tono-Pen; Intraocular pressure; Diurnal fluctuation; Central corneal thickness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To estimate agreement in diurnal variations of intraocular pressure (IOP) by Tono-Pen (TP) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in glaucoma patients on topical anti-glaucoma medication(s). IOP was measured at every 3 h from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. in 50 eyes of glaucoma patients on topical medication(s). Diurnal fluctuation of IOP by each method was calculated as maximum–minimum IOP in a day. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymeter. There was good correlation between TP and GAT at all times during a day, minimum, and maximum IOPs during a day (Correlation coefficient, 0.706 at 7 a.m., 0.624 at 10 a.m., 0.682 at 1 p.m., 0.814 at 4 p.m., 0.652 at 7 p.m., 0.572 at 10 p.m., 0.668 minimum IOP, 0.689 maximum IOP). Mean IOPs by TP were always higher than GAT at all times during a day. Bland–Altman plots suggested a close relationship between the two sets of readings, and that this relationship was consistent at different times in a day, in maximum IOPs, minimum IOPs and also in fluctuation of IOPs. Linear regression analysis between the differences of diurnal fluctuation (diurnal fluctuation by GAT-diurnal fluctuation by TP) and CCT showed strong association (R2 = 0.857, p < 0.001). The mean change in difference of diurnal fluctuation (GAT–TP) for a 10-micron increase in CCT was 0.69 mmHg. TP can be considered a reliable alternative to GAT in glaucoma patients for knowing the diurnal control of IOP; however these two methods should not be used interchangeably. Difference of diurnal fluctuation between two methods is dependent on CCT.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 93 条
[21]  
Iester M(2008)Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes Br J Ophtalmol 92 1661-1665
[22]  
Mermoud A(2007)Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85 272-279
[23]  
Achache F(2009)Comparisons of intraocular pressure measurements: Goldmann applanation tonometry, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen tonometry, and dynamic contour tonometry Eye (Lond) 23 1582-1588
[24]  
Roy S(2008)Weinreb RN association of central corneal thickness and 24-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation J Glaucoma 17 85-88
[25]  
Bhartiya S(2010)Can mean central corneal thickness and its 24-hour fluctuation influence fluctuation of intraocular pressure? J Glaucoma 19 418-423
[26]  
Bali SJ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[27]  
Sharma R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[28]  
Chaturvedi N(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[29]  
Dada T(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[30]  
Bland JM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined