Agreement between diurnal variations of intraocular pressure by Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients on topical anti-glaucoma medication

被引:0
作者
Shikha Gupta
Gautam Sinha
Reetika Sharma
Bhagabat Nayak
Bharat Patil
Bibhuti Kashyap
Abdul Shameer
Tanuj Dada
机构
[1] All India Institute of Medical Sciences,Dr Rajendra Prasad Center for Ophthalmic Sciences
[2] All India Institute of Medical Sciences,Dr Rajendra Prasad Center for Ophthalmic Sciences
来源
International Ophthalmology | 2016年 / 36卷
关键词
Glaucoma; Goldmann applanation; Tono-Pen; Intraocular pressure; Diurnal fluctuation; Central corneal thickness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To estimate agreement in diurnal variations of intraocular pressure (IOP) by Tono-Pen (TP) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in glaucoma patients on topical anti-glaucoma medication(s). IOP was measured at every 3 h from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. in 50 eyes of glaucoma patients on topical medication(s). Diurnal fluctuation of IOP by each method was calculated as maximum–minimum IOP in a day. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymeter. There was good correlation between TP and GAT at all times during a day, minimum, and maximum IOPs during a day (Correlation coefficient, 0.706 at 7 a.m., 0.624 at 10 a.m., 0.682 at 1 p.m., 0.814 at 4 p.m., 0.652 at 7 p.m., 0.572 at 10 p.m., 0.668 minimum IOP, 0.689 maximum IOP). Mean IOPs by TP were always higher than GAT at all times during a day. Bland–Altman plots suggested a close relationship between the two sets of readings, and that this relationship was consistent at different times in a day, in maximum IOPs, minimum IOPs and also in fluctuation of IOPs. Linear regression analysis between the differences of diurnal fluctuation (diurnal fluctuation by GAT-diurnal fluctuation by TP) and CCT showed strong association (R2 = 0.857, p < 0.001). The mean change in difference of diurnal fluctuation (GAT–TP) for a 10-micron increase in CCT was 0.69 mmHg. TP can be considered a reliable alternative to GAT in glaucoma patients for knowing the diurnal control of IOP; however these two methods should not be used interchangeably. Difference of diurnal fluctuation between two methods is dependent on CCT.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 15
页数:6
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Kass MA(2002)The Ocular hypertension treatment study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 120 701-713
[2]  
Heuer DK(2007)Intercurrent factors associated with the development of open angle glaucoma in the European glaucoma prevention study Am J Ophthalmol 144 266-275
[3]  
Higginbotham EJ(1996)Delayed functional loss in glaucoma. LII Edward Jackson memorial lecture Am J Ophthalmol 121 473-483
[4]  
Johnson CA(1963)Diurnal variation of intraocular pressure in treated glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 70 302-311
[5]  
Keltner JL(1957)Applanation tonometry Ophthalmologica 134 221-242
[6]  
Miller JP(1993)Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers Surv Ophthalmol 38 1-30
[7]  
Parrish RK(1959)Fast, automatic, electronic tonometers based on an exact theory Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 13 495-507
[8]  
Wilson MR(2001)New Tonopen XL: comparison with the Goldmann tonometer Eye (Lond) 13 52-58
[9]  
Gordon MO(2011)Comparative evaluation of TonoPen AVIA, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry Int Ophthalmol 13 297-302
[10]  
Miglior S(1986)Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307-310