Factors Leading to Pregnancies in Stimulated Intrauterine Insemination Cycles and the Use of Consecutive Ejaculations Within a Small Clinic Environment

被引:8
作者
Bahadur G. [1 ]
Almossawi O. [1 ]
IIlahibuccus A. [1 ]
Al-Habib A. [1 ]
Okolo S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Reproductive Medicine Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, Old Admin Block, Sterling Way, London
关键词
Consecutive ejaculates; Gonadotrophin; Intrauterine insemination; Male factor infertility; Total progressive motile sperm;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-016-0876-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Understanding and improving IUI pregnancy rates has enormous global appeal and application. This pilot study goes one step further by utilising consecutive ejaculates from men with oligozoospermia and comparing with normozoospermic male group. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 117 IUI-stimulated treatment cycles in a small fertility clinic in North Middlesex University Hospitals Trust, UK, within a NHS setting. Risks of OHSS and multiple births are carefully controlled. Results: In our cohort, several factors are associated with positive IUI pregnancies and these were: age of the woman, inseminating with ≥5 total progressive motile sperm; having ≥50 % Grade A sperm progression and having ≥1 follicle achieved with a realistic hMG dosage, hCG trigger and IUI of 29.7 h (2.5–38.4 h), with an endometrial thickness of 10.7 mm (6.6–13.4 mm). Bifollicular presence in at least half the cases along with hMG protocols added usefully to the pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: The pregnancy rates per cycle were 19 and 23 % in the consecutive ejaculates and non-consecutive ejaculate groups, respectively, P = 0.59. For the whole cohort, the pregnancy rate was 20.51 % per cycle and 33.8 % per women. This approach if validated with large RCT will have universally beneficial effects. © 2016, Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 520
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Cohen M.R., Intrauterine insemination, Int J Fertil, 7, pp. 235-240, (1962)
[2]  
Bahadur G., Homburg R., Ilahibuccus A., IVF and intrauterine insemination cannot be compared, Reprod BioMed, 31, 2, pp. 246-247, (2015)
[3]  
Rogers L., The cut-price fertility boost that childless couples are not told about: IUI versus IVF ‘comes down to profit margins’, say doctors, (2015)
[4]  
Duran H.E., Morshedi M., Kruger T., Et al., Intrauterine insemination: a systematic review on determinants of success, Hum Reprod Update, 8, pp. 373-384, (2002)
[5]  
Dickey R.P., Taylor S.N., Lu P.Y., Et al., Risk factors for high-order multiple pregnancy and multiple birth after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: results of 4,062 intrauterine insemination cycles, Fertil Steril, 83, 3, pp. 671-683, (2005)
[6]  
Tomlinson M.J., Amissah-Arthur J.B., Thompson K.A., Et al., Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): statistical model for IUI success, Hum Reprod, 11, 9, pp. 1892-1896, (1996)
[7]  
van der Poel N., Farquhar C., Abou-Setta A.M., Et al., Soft versus firm catheters for intrauterine insemination, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10, 11, (2010)
[8]  
Nulsen J.C., Walsh S., Dumez S., Et al., A randomized and longitudinal study of human menopausal gonadotropin with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility, Obstet Gynecol, 82, pp. 780-786, (1993)
[9]  
Plosker S.M., Jacobson W., Amato P., Predicting and optimizing success in an intra-uterine insemination programme, Hum Reprod, 9, pp. 2014-2021, (1994)
[10]  
Depypere H.T., Gordts S., Campo R., Et al., Methods to increase the success rate of artificial insemination with donor sperm, Hum Reprod, 9, pp. 661-663, (1994)