Examining the Effects of Agency Accreditation on Police Officer Behavior

被引:0
作者
Johnson R.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Criminal Justice, University of Toledo, 2801 W. Bancroft St., MS 119, Toledo, 43606, OH
关键词
Accreditation; CALEA; Community policing; Management; Organizational behavior; Police; Public policy; Supervision;
D O I
10.1007/s11115-013-0265-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The policy of accreditation of criminal justice organizations has grown over the last four decades. Some advocates for accreditation claim that it facilitates organizational change at all levels of the organization. To date, however, little empirical research has examined these claims, especially within criminal justice agencies. While accreditation leads agencies to adopt formal policies, the previous literature on street-level bureaucrat behavior would suggest rank-and-file employees are unlikely to follow these formal policies as intended. The Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA) is the accrediting body for law enforcement agencies in North America, and part of the formal policies CALEA accreditation requires regard engagement in community oriented policing. The present study examined whether officers on CALEA accredited agencies differed from officers with agencies not seeking accreditation, with regard to their engagement in community policing activities. The findings revealed that agency accreditation was not associated with the degree to which officers engaged in community oriented policing activities. © 2013, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 155
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Alpert G.P., MacDonald J., Police use of force: an analysis of organizational characteristics, Justice Quarterly, 18, pp. 393-409, (2001)
[2]  
Archbold C.A., Police accountability, risk management, and legal advising, (2004)
[3]  
Bianco W., Bates R., Cooperation by design: leadership, structure, and collective dilemmas, American Political Science Review, 84, pp. 133-148, (1990)
[4]  
Brehm J., Gates S., Donut shops and speed traps: evaluating models of supervision on police behavior, American Journal of Political Science, 37, pp. 555-581, (1993)
[5]  
Brehm J., Gates S., When supervision fails to induce compliance, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, pp. 323-344, (1994)
[6]  
Brehm J., Gates S., Working, shirking, and sabotage, (1997)
[7]  
Brittingham B., Accreditation in the United States: how did we get to where we are?, New Directions for Higher Education, 2009, pp. 7-27, (2009)
[8]  
Casile M., Davis-Blake A., When accreditation standards change: factors affecting differential responsiveness of public and private organizations, Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp. 180-195, (2002)
[9]  
Chappell A.T., The philosophical versus actual adoption of community policing, Criminal Justice Review, 34, pp. 5-28, (2009)
[10]  
Standards for law enforcement agencies, (2006)