Fenestrated pedicle screws for cement-augmented purchase in patients with bone softening: A review of 21 cases

被引:72
作者
Amendola L. [1 ]
Gasbarrini A. [2 ]
Fosco M. [3 ]
Simoes C.E. [4 ]
Terzi S. [2 ]
De Iure F. [1 ]
Boriani S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Spine Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore C.A. Pizzardi, Bologna
[2] Department of Oncological and Degenerative Spine Surgery, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna
[3] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Istituti Ortopedici Rizzoli, Bologna
[4] Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Spine Surgery Unit, Hospital Felício Rocho, Belo Horizonte
关键词
Fenestrated pedicle screw; Osteoporotic bone; Polymethylmethacrylate; Spine tumor;
D O I
10.1007/s10195-011-0164-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background This prospective mixed cohort study was designed to evaluate the middle- to long-term purchase of cement-augmented pedicular screws in patients with poor bone quality. The growing number of surgical procedures performed in the spine has highlighted the problem of screws loosening in patients with poor bone stock due to osteoporosis and/or tumors. Different methods of increasing screw purchase have been reported in the literature, including polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation. Materials and methods From September 2006 to April 2008, 21 patients with a poor bone stock condition due to osteoporosis or tumor underwent posterior stabilization by fenestrated pedicle screws and PMMA augmentation. Pain improvement and long-term clinical outcome were assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) score and SF-36 health survey (SF-36) questionnaire. Implant stability was evaluated by plain radiography and CT scans performed three days after surgery and every three months thereafter. After the first 12 months, radiologic controls were taken once a year in all surviving patients. Complications were evaluated in all cases. Results All patients were clinically and radiographically followed up for a mean of 36 months. VAS scores and SF- 36 questionnaires showed a statistically significant reduction in pain and improvement in the quality of life. No radiological loosening or pulling out of screws was observed. In two cases, cement leakage occurred intraoperatively: one patient who suffered from a transitory nerve root palsy improved spontaneously, while the surgeon immediately removed the excess cement before setting in the other case. In three cases, the post-op CT scan revealed a small amount of cement in the canal without clinical relevance. Conclusions Fenestrated screws for cement augmentation provided effective and lasting purchase in patients with poor bone quality due to osteoporosis or tumors. No case of loosening was recorded after a mean follow-up of 36 months. The only clinical complication strictly related to PMMA screw augmentation did not require further surgery. © The Author(s) 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Cook S.D., Barbera J., Rubi M., Salkeld S.L., Whitecloud III T.S., Lumbosacral fixation using expandable pedicle screws: An alternative in reoperation and osteoporosis, Spine Journal, 1, 2, pp. 109-114, (2001)
[2]  
Nicoli Aldini N., Fini M., Giavaresi G., Giardino R., Greggi T., Parisini P., Pedicular fixation in the osteoporotic spine: A pilot in vivo study on long-term ovariectomized sheep, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 20, 6, pp. 1217-1224, (2002)
[3]  
Hasegawa T., Inufusa A., Imai Y., Mikawa Y., Lim T.-H., An H.S., Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: A pilot study, Spine Journal, 5, 3, pp. 239-243, (2005)
[4]  
Zindrick M.R., Wiltse L.L., Widell E.H., A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 203, pp. 99-112, (1986)
[5]  
Polly D.W., Orchowski J.R., Ellenbogen R.G., Revision pedicle screws: Bigger, longer shims-what is best?, Spine, 12, pp. 1374-1375, (1998)
[6]  
Hirano T., Hasegawa K., Washio T., Hara T., Takahashi H., Fracture risk during pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic spine, Journal of Spinal Disorders, 11, 6, pp. 493-497, (1998)
[7]  
Wuisman P.I.J.M., Van Dijk M., Staal H., Van Royen B.J., Augmentation of (pedicle) screws with calcium apatite cement in patients with severe progressive osteoporotic spinal deformities: An innovative technique, European Spine Journal, 9, 6, pp. 528-533, (2000)
[8]  
Burval D.J., McLain R.F., Milks R., Inceoglu S., Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: Biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength, Spine, 32, 10, pp. 1077-1083, (2007)
[9]  
Glassman S.D., Alegre G.M., Adult spinal deformity in the osteoporotic spine: Options and pitfalls, Instr Course Lect, 52, pp. 579-588, (2003)
[10]  
Riseborough E.J., Irradiation induced kyphosis, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 128, pp. 101-106, (1977)