Genome-wide specificity of plant genome editing by both CRISPR–Cas9 and TALEN

被引:0
作者
Nadia Bessoltane
Florence Charlot
Anouchka Guyon-Debast
Delphine Charif
Kostlend Mara
Cécile Collonnier
Pierre-François Perroud
Mark Tepfer
Fabien Nogué
机构
[1] Université Paris-Saclay,
[2] INRAE,undefined
[3] AgroParisTech,undefined
[4] Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB),undefined
[5] CSIRO Health and Biosecurity,undefined
[6] Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness,undefined
[7] Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO),undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CRISPR and TALENs are efficient systems for gene editing in many organisms including plants. In many cases the CRISPR–Cas or TALEN modules are expressed in the plant cell only transiently. Theoretically, transient expression of the editing modules should limit unexpected effects compared to stable transformation. However, very few studies have measured the off-target and unpredicted effects of editing strategies on the plant genome, and none of them have compared these two major editing systems. We conducted, in Physcomitrium patens, a comprehensive genome-wide investigation of off-target mutations using either a CRISPR–Cas9 or a TALEN strategy. We observed a similar number of differences for the two editing strategies compared to control non-transfected plants, with an average of 8.25 SNVs and 19.5 InDels for the CRISPR-edited plants, and an average of 17.5 SNVs and 32 InDels for the TALEN-edited plants. Interestingly, a comparable number of SNVs and InDels could be detected in the PEG-treated control plants. This shows that except for the on-target modifications, the gene editing tools used in this study did not show a significant off-target activity nor unpredicted effects on the genome, and did not lead to transgene integration. The PEG treatment, a well-established biotechnological method, in itself, was the main source of mutations found in the edited plants.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 92 条
[41]  
Manavella P(2015)Historical review of research on plant cell dedifferentiation J Plant Res 9 526-2871
[42]  
Lohmann JU(1987)Effects of high osmotic strength on chromosome aberrations, sister-chromatid exchanges and DNA strand breaks, and the relation to toxicity Mutat. Res. Toxicol. 30 2114-e34
[43]  
Rensing SA(2014)Low incidence of off-target mutations in individual CRISPR–Cas9 and TALEN targeted human stem cell clones detected by whole-genome sequencing Cell Stem Cell 25 1754-664
[44]  
Lang D(2010)RAD51 loss of function abolishes gene targeting and de-represses illegitimate integration in the moss Physcomitrella patens DNA Repair (Amst). 43 491-undefined
[45]  
Nomura T(2014)Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data Bioinformatics 6 80-undefined
[46]  
Sakurai T(2009)Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform Bioinformatics 25 2865-undefined
[47]  
Osakabe Y(2011)A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data Nat. Genet. 77 e31-undefined
[48]  
Osakabe K(2017)Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples bioRxiv 12 656-undefined
[49]  
Sakakibara H(2012)A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3 Fly (Austin). undefined undefined-undefined
[50]  
Lopez-Obando M(2009)Pindel: A pattern growth approach to detect break points of large deletions and medium sized insertions from paired-end short reads Bioinformatics undefined undefined-undefined