Genome-wide specificity of plant genome editing by both CRISPR–Cas9 and TALEN

被引:0
作者
Nadia Bessoltane
Florence Charlot
Anouchka Guyon-Debast
Delphine Charif
Kostlend Mara
Cécile Collonnier
Pierre-François Perroud
Mark Tepfer
Fabien Nogué
机构
[1] Université Paris-Saclay,
[2] INRAE,undefined
[3] AgroParisTech,undefined
[4] Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin (IJPB),undefined
[5] CSIRO Health and Biosecurity,undefined
[6] Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness,undefined
[7] Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO),undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 12卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CRISPR and TALENs are efficient systems for gene editing in many organisms including plants. In many cases the CRISPR–Cas or TALEN modules are expressed in the plant cell only transiently. Theoretically, transient expression of the editing modules should limit unexpected effects compared to stable transformation. However, very few studies have measured the off-target and unpredicted effects of editing strategies on the plant genome, and none of them have compared these two major editing systems. We conducted, in Physcomitrium patens, a comprehensive genome-wide investigation of off-target mutations using either a CRISPR–Cas9 or a TALEN strategy. We observed a similar number of differences for the two editing strategies compared to control non-transfected plants, with an average of 8.25 SNVs and 19.5 InDels for the CRISPR-edited plants, and an average of 17.5 SNVs and 32 InDels for the TALEN-edited plants. Interestingly, a comparable number of SNVs and InDels could be detected in the PEG-treated control plants. This shows that except for the on-target modifications, the gene editing tools used in this study did not show a significant off-target activity nor unpredicted effects on the genome, and did not lead to transgene integration. The PEG treatment, a well-established biotechnological method, in itself, was the main source of mutations found in the edited plants.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Podevin N(2013)Site-directed nucleases: A paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding Trends Biotechnol. 31 375-383
[2]  
Davies HV(2021)Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture Cell 256 153313-10
[3]  
Hartung F(2021)Crop breeding—From experience-based selection to precision design J. Plant Physiol. 4 e264-1471
[4]  
Nogué F(2015)Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 11 1501-365
[5]  
Casacuberta JM(2020)Genome-wide analysis of off-target CRISPR/Cas9 activity in single-cell-derived human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell clones Genes (Basel) 13 1-243
[6]  
Gao C(2022)CRISPR–Cas9 induces large structural variants at on-target and off-target sites in vivo that segregate across generations Nat. Commun. 183 1453-614
[7]  
Liu J(2020)Plant genome editing and the relevance of off-target changes1[OPEN] Plant Physiol. 11 1838-606
[8]  
Fernie AR(2020)Which factors affect the occurrence of off-target effects caused by the use of CRISPR/Cas: A systematic review in plants Front. Plant Sci. 10 361-197
[9]  
Yan J(2022)Occurrence and nature of off-target modifications by CRISPR–Cas genome editing in plants ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 12 237-186
[10]  
Zhang XH(2013)Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing Nat. Methods 14 607-419