From risk perception to risk governance in nanotechnology: a multi-stakeholder study

被引:0
作者
Andrea Porcari
Elisabetta Borsella
Christina Benighaus
Khara Grieger
Panagiotis Isigonis
Somik Chakravarty
Pete Kines
Keld Alstrup Jensen
机构
[1] Italian Association for Industrial Research (Airi),Genetic Engineering and Society Center
[2] Dialogik,Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics
[3] Gemeinnützige Gesellschaft für Kommunikations- und Kooperationsforschung mbH,undefined
[4] North Carolina State University,undefined
[5] Ca’ Foscari University,undefined
[6] Steinbeis Advanced Risk Technologies GmbH,undefined
[7] National Research Centre for the Working Environment,undefined
来源
Journal of Nanoparticle Research | 2019年 / 21卷
关键词
Nanomaterials; Nano-related products; Risk assessment; Risk management; Risk communication; Decision analysis; Risk-benefit of nanomaterials; Societal implications;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Nanotechnology is widely used in several industrial and consumer sectors and has the potential to grow further and expand globally. An exploration of stakeholder (SH)’s perceptions is essential to ensuring that robust risk governance processes are in place for nanotechnology and nano-related products. In response, numerous studies have been conducted to investigate SH’s perceptions of nanotechnology and nano-related products over the past 15 years. To build on this work and to capture current perceptions across a wide panel of SHs, we conducted a multi-national and cross-sectoral SH study of awareness, perceptions and opinions regarding the use and potential impact on society and the environment of nanomaterials (NMs) and nano-related products, and SH’s expectations about risk governance. The study was conducted using both quantitative and qualitative inquiries and targeted more than 3000 SHs across different sectors in a total of 15 countries. Results showed a tendency towards more convergence of opinions amongst all the relevant SHs and the public respondents than in past studies. There was consensus on the crucial importance of having unbiased, scientific and trustable information regarding the potential impacts of NMs and nano-related products on the environment, health and safety. SHs were interested in having more internationally harmonised and robust regulation for NMs and nano-related products; improved scientific evidence on nanomaterial hazards, exposures and effects; as well as specific guidance on the safe use of NMs. Overall, this work provides an updated scenario of SHs’ perceptions regarding nanotechnology and nano-related products, underscoring the importance of including SH needs in effective risk governance strategies.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 114 条
[1]  
Besley J(2010)Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology Emerging Health Threats Journal 3 7098-31
[2]  
Brown J(2015)Altruism and skepticism in public attitudes toward food nanotechnologies Journal of Nanoparticle Research 17 1-404
[3]  
Fatehi L(2011)From enabling technology to applications: the evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology Public Understanding of Science 20 385-405
[4]  
Kuzma J(2015)Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes BMC Public Health 15 424-87
[5]  
Cacciatore MA(2004)Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6 395-131
[6]  
Scheufele DA(2016)Nanotechnology in Dutch science cafés: public risk perceptions contextualised Public Understanding of Science 25 71-90
[7]  
Corley EA(2016)Fibrosis biomarkers in workers exposed to MWCNTs Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 299 125-108
[8]  
Capon A(2017)Perceptions and attitude effects on nanotechnology acceptance: an exploratory framework Journal of Nanoparticle Research 19 41-1704
[9]  
Gillespie J(2005)Imagining nanotechnology: cultural support for technological innovation in Europe and the United States Public Understanding of Science 14 81-289
[10]  
Rolfe M(2015)Ethics, risk and benefits associated with different applications of nanotechnology: a comparison of expert and consumer perceptions of drivers of societal acceptance NanoEthics 9 93-483