National-scale professional development in Sweden: theory, policy, practice

被引:8
作者
Boesen J. [1 ]
Helenius O. [2 ]
Johansson B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Educational Sciences and Teacher Research, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
[2] National Centre for Mathematics Education, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg
来源
ZDM | 2015年 / 47卷 / 1期
关键词
Professional Development; Professional Development Programme; National Agency; Teacher Change; Effective Professional Development;
D O I
10.1007/s11858-014-0653-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
From 2012 to 2016 all teachers of mathematics, in primary through to upper secondary and adult education, in Sweden are to be given the opportunity of receiving state-coordinated professional development (PD), generally involving around one meeting per week for a year. We examine the ways in which this programme and its content are research-based by analysing the design principles of the PD and its content via a review of the underlying documents. We find that the research base for the design of the PD decisions is formulated only partly explicitly in the documentation, as is the case for the content. Nevertheless, the principles still largely conform to internationally recognised research-based models for PD and teacher change. In the discussion we propose that a relatively open design process, involving many stakeholders with knowledge of both theory and practice rather than an analytical examination of previous research, has contributed to the adoption of this format for the PD programme. © 2014, FIZ Karlsruhe.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 141
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Baumert J., Kunter M., Blum W., Brunner M., Voss T., Jordan A., Et al., Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom and student progress, American Educational Research Journal, 47, pp. 133-180, (2010)
[2]  
Blomeke S., Suhl U., Kaiser G., Teacher education effectiveness: quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge, Journal of Teacher Education, 62, pp. 154-171, (2011)
[3]  
Blomeke S., Suhl U., Kaiser G., Dohrmann M., Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: what matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries, Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, pp. 44-55, (2012)
[4]  
Borko H., Professional development and teacher learning: mapping the terrain, Educational Researcher, 33, 8, pp. 3-15, (2004)
[5]  
Buchberger F., Campos B.P., Kallos D., Stephenson J., Green paper on teacher education in Europe: High quality teacher education for high quality education and training, Thematic Network on Teacher Education in Europe, (2000)
[6]  
Clarke D., Hollingsworth H., Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth, Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, pp. 947-967, (2002)
[7]  
Cobb P., Jackson K., Towards an empirically grounded theory of action for improving the quality of mathematics teaching at scale, Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13, 1, pp. 6-33, (2011)
[8]  
Cordingley P., Bell M., Evans D., Firth A., The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning. Review: What do teacher impact data tell us about collaborative CPD? EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, (2005)
[9]  
Cordingley P., Bell M., Thomason S., Firth A., The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: How do collaborative and sustained CPD and sustained but not collaborative CPD affect teaching and learning? EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, (2005)
[10]  
Darling-Hammond L., Wei R.C., Andree A., Richardson N., Orphanos S., Professional learning in the learning profession: A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad, (2009)