Linguistic imperialism: still a valid construct in relation to language policy for Irish Sign Language

被引:0
作者
Heath Rose
John Bosco Conama
机构
[1] The University of Oxford,Department of Education
[2] The University of Dublin,Trinity College Dublin
来源
Language Policy | 2018年 / 17卷
关键词
Linguistic imperialism; Sign language; Ireland; Irish Sign Language;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Linguistic imperialism—a term used to conceptualize the dominance of one language over others—has been debated in language policy for more than two decades. Spolsky (Language policy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004), for example, has questioned whether the spread of English was a result of language planning, or was incidental to colonialism and globalization. Phillipson (Lang Policy 6(3):377–383, 2007) contests this view, arguing that linguistic imperialism is not based on ‘conspiracy’, and is underpinned by evidence of explicit or implicit language policy that aims to intentionally advantage some languages at the expense of others. This paper analyses Irish Sign Language policy, or lack thereof, in terms of linguistic imperialism. It does this by presenting evidence within a conceptual framework of linguistic imperialism to explore how discrimination and inequality occurs in relation to Irish Sign Language users in Ireland. The findings highlight many policies and practices that fit the linguistic imperialism paradigm including linguicism, audism, and the denial of linguistic rights. The paper, therefore, challenges some views in language policy that linguistic imperialism lacks credibility by highlighting a current case of minority language (ISL) users under imperialistic-like control of policy geared towards a dominant language (English).
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 404
页数:19
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Bauman HDL(2004)Audism: Exploring the meta-physics of oppresion Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 9 239-246
  • [2] Branson J(1998)Nationalism and the linguistic rights of deaf communities: Linguistic imperialism and the recognition and development of sign languages Journal of Sociolinguistics 2 3-34
  • [3] Miller D(2002)Mismatches in language policy and practice in education: The case of Gaelscoileanna in the Republic of Ireland Language Policy 1 143-158
  • [4] Coady M(2017)Promotion in times of endangerment: The Sign Language Act in Finland Language Policy 16 189-208
  • [5] Laoire MÓ(2012)Language acquisition for deaf children: Reducing the harms of zero tolerance to the use of alternative approaches Harm Reduction Journal 9 16-146
  • [6] De Meulder M(2017)Discourses of prejudice in the professions: the case of sign languages Journal of Medical Ethics 60 133-14
  • [7] Humphries T(1991)Dysconscious racism: Ideology, identity, and the miseducation of teachers The Journal of Negro Education 15 1-106
  • [8] Kushalnagar P(2015)Towards an independent future: Life skills training and vulnerable deaf adults Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies 5 97-94
  • [9] Mathur G(1992)Vested interests in the development of special education in Ireland Reach 18 77-247
  • [10] Napoli DJ(2011)Human rights and the deaf community in Ireland Clinical Speech and Language Studies 18 238-137