Current status of risk stratification methods in acute coronary syndromes

被引:23
作者
See R. [1 ]
De Lemos J.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiology Division, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9047
关键词
Acute Coronary Syndrome; Acute Coronary Event; Placental Growth Factor; Pursuit Model; Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-006-0060-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Distinguishing which patients with chest pain are at high risk versus which are at low risk remains an important clinical problem despite modern risk stratification strategies. Current approaches often over-utilize hospital resources, yet still miss a significant number of true acute coronary syndromes (ACS). This review focuses on important developments in risk stratification in ACS from 2004 through 2005. Risk models have been developed that use readily available patient characteristics, and head to head comparisons of the various models have been performed to guide clinicians in selecting between the different options. The most powerful models now include measurement of renal function, which has emerged as an important marker of risk. In addition to cardiac troponins, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) clearly augments risk prediction, and in the past year serial BNP measurement after discharge has shown promise as a simple way to monitor patient risk following ACS. Newer biomarkers are on the horizon but have not yet established their clinical value. Finally, advances in coronary CT angiography and bedside echocardiography offer hope that noninvasive imaging may play a more important role in early risk stratification in the near future. Copyright © 2006 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 288
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
McCaig L.F., Burt C.W., National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 Emergency Department Summary. Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics, (2003)
[2]  
Goldman L., Weinberg M., Weisberg M., Et al., A computer derived protocol to aid in the diagnosis of emergency room patients with acute chest pain, N Engl J Med, 307, pp. 588-596, (1982)
[3]  
McCarthy B.D., Beshansky J.F., D'Agostino R.B., Et al., Missed diagnoses of acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department: Results from a multicenter study, Ann Emerg Med, 22, pp. 579-582, (1993)
[4]  
Pope J.H., Aufderheide T.P., Ruthazer R., Et al., Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department, N Engl J Med, 342, pp. 1163-1170, (2000)
[5]  
Antman E.M., Cohen M., Bernink P.J.L.M., Et al., The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI, JAMA, 284, pp. 835-842, (2000)
[6]  
Granger C.B., Goldberg R.J., Dabbous O.H., Et al., Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events, Arch Intern Med, 163, pp. 2345-2353, (2003)
[7]  
Boersma E., Pieper K.S., Steyerberg E.W., Et al., Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients, Circulation, 101, pp. 2557-2567, (2000)
[8]  
Goncalves P.A., Ferreira J., Aguiar C., Et al., TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: Sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE-ACS, Eur Heart J, 26, pp. 865-872, (2005)
[9]  
Yan A.T., Jong P., Yan R.T., Et al., Clinical trial-derived risk model may not generalize to real-world patients with acute coronary syndrome, Am Heart J, 148, pp. 1020-1027, (2004)
[10]  
Gibson C.M., Dumaine R.L., Gelfand E.V., Et al., Association of glomerular filtration rate on presentation with subsequent mortality in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome