Equitable Access to Informal Science Education Institutions

被引:0
作者
Paichi Pat Shein
David Swinkels
Chi-Chen Chen
机构
[1] National Sun Yat-sen University,Faculty of Geosciences
[2] Utrecht University,Center for Teacher Education
[3] National Sun Yat-sen University,Institute of Education
[4] National Sun Yat-sen University,undefined
来源
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher | 2019年 / 28卷
关键词
Access; Equity; Informal science education; Non-visitors; Outreach; Social inclusion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Science for all is a global educational pursuit; however, the realities in formal science education show that it is a goal still challenged by inequitable outcomes that are marked by gender, race/ethnicity, language, culture, and socioeconomic status. Whether these inequities persist in the informal settings still remained a question that is open for more investigation. This empirical study aims to examine the factors that relate to access to informal science education institutions. A representative sample of 1611 Taiwanese adults was asked if they have visited six popular informal science education institutions in the last 12 months. Nine factors related to travel distance, social demography, and scientific literacy, were included to explain the likelihood of visiting each institution. The findings showed that the travel distance, education, presence of children, interest in scientific issues, and attitudes toward these institutions were statistically significant predictors of visitation. The paper provides empirical and practical implications to help informal science educators and policy makers to ensure equitable access to these institutions for all.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 170
页数:11
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Adelman LM(2000)Impact of National Aquarium in Baltimore on visitors’ conservation attitudes, behavior, and knowledge Curator: The Museum Journal 43 33-36
  • [2] Falk JH(2002)Children’s museum experiences: Identifying powerful mediators of learning Curator: The Museum Journal 45 213-231
  • [3] James S(2015)“Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 922-948
  • [4] Anderson D(2012)Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus how families shape children’s engagement and identification with science American Educational Research Journal 49 881-908
  • [5] Piscitelli B(2013)Science centers and public participation: Methods, strategies, and barriers Science Communication 35 419-448
  • [6] Weier K(2009)The need for public participation in the governance of science centers Museum Management and Curatorship 24 89-104
  • [7] Everett M(2008)Why family learning in museums? Exhibitionist 27 6-9
  • [8] Tayler C(1999)Gender roles in science museum learning Visitor Studies Today 3 11-14
  • [9] Archer L(2013)Visitors of two types of museums: A segmentation study Expert Systems with Applications 40 2224-2232
  • [10] Dawson E(2014)Equity in informal science education: Developing an access and equity framework for science museums and science centres Studies in Science Education 50 209-247