Beyond a Human Rights-Based Approach to AI Governance: Promise, Pitfalls, Plea

被引:0
作者
Nathalie A. Smuha
机构
[1] KU Leuven,Department of International & European Law, Faculty of Law
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Ethics; Human rights; AI governance; AI for good;
D O I
10.1007/s13347-020-00403-w
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses the establishment of a governance framework to secure the development and deployment of “good AI”, and describes the quest for a morally objective compass to steer it. Asserting that human rights can provide such compass, this paper first examines what a human rights-based approach to AI governance entails, and sets out the promise it propagates. Subsequently, it examines the pitfalls associated with human rights, particularly focusing on the criticism that these rights may be too Western, too individualistic, too narrow in scope and too abstract to form the basis of sound AI governance. After rebutting these reproaches, a plea is made to move beyond the calls for a human rights-based approach, and start taking the necessary steps to attain its realisation. It is argued that, without elucidating the applicability and enforceability of human rights in the context of AI; adopting legal rules that concretise those rights where appropriate; enhancing existing enforcement mechanisms and securing an underlying societal infrastructure that enables human rights in the first place, any human rights-based governance framework for AI risks falling short of its purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 104
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Baughen S(2015)Customary international law and its horizontal effect? Human rights litigation between non-state actors Rutgers University Law Review 67 89-126
[2]  
Beerendt B(2019)AI for the common good?! Pitfalls, challenges and ethics pen-testing Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics 10 44-65
[3]  
de Mol M(2016)Article 51 of the charter in the legislative processes of the member states Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 23 640-666
[4]  
Gerard J(2011)Pluralism, deference and the margin of appreciation doctrine European Law Journal 17 80-120
[5]  
Greer S(2015)Is the prohibition against torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment really ‘absolute’ in international human rights law? Human Rights Law Review 15 101-137
[6]  
Huber W(2014)Human rights and globalisation – are human rights a ‘Western’ concept or a universalistic principle? NGTT DEEL 55 117-137
[7]  
Jobin A(2019)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines Nat Mach Intell 1 389-399
[8]  
Ienca M(2008)Horizontal human rights law American Journal of International Law 102 1-47
[9]  
Vayena E(2016)Are human rights universal or culturally relative? Peace Review 28 203-211
[10]  
Knox J(2019)International human rights law as a framework for algorithmic accountability ICLQ 68 309-343