The legacy of Max Weber and the early Austrians

被引:0
作者
Stefan Kolev
机构
[1] University of Applied Sciences Zwickau,Faculty of Business and Economics
[2] Wilhelm Röpke Institute,undefined
来源
The Review of Austrian Economics | 2020年 / 33卷
关键词
Max Weber; Joseph Schumpeter; Schools in economic thought; Methodenstreit; Social economics; Economic sociology; B13; B15; B53; P16; Z13;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores Max Weber’s intellectual relationship to the first generations of the Austrian School. Challenging his portrayal as a one-sided historicist, the paper reconstructs Weber’s intense involvement with the Viennese economists from the 1890s to his passing in 1920 and his efforts to overcome the fronts left behind by the Methodenstreit. Section 2 discusses a number of necessary conditions for declaring a scholarly community a “school”. Section 3 systematizes the multiple biographical connections, especially Weber’s nexus to Friedrich von Wieser and Joseph Schumpeter. Section 4 focuses on the research program of Social Economics during the first decades of the twentieth century as the “irenic formula” for the post-Methodenstreit hostilities. Within Social Economics, economic sociology constitutes an “intermediary” layer between economic theory and economic history, addressing the institutional properties of the framework surrounding the processes of human action and exchange. Depending on the relative importance and qualifying power of economic sociology vis-à-vis economic theory, the paper distinguishes two varieties of Social Economics, a “universalist” and an “institutionalist” one.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 54
页数:21
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Ashford R(2004)What is socioeconomics? San Diego Law Review 41 5-10
[2]  
Bažantová I(2016)Czech economist Karel Engliš and his relation to the Austrian school in the first half of the 20th century Prague Economics Papers 25 234-246
[3]  
Boettke PJ(1989)Evolution and economics: Austrians as institutionalists Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 6 73-89
[4]  
Brühlmeier D(2014)Book Review: Max Weber. Preuße, Denker, Muttersohn. Eine Biographie (by Dirk Kaesler) and Max Weber. Ein Leben zwischen den Epochen (by Jürgen Kaube) Swiss Political Science Review 20 498-514
[5]  
Caldwell BJ(2001)There really was a German historical school of economics: A comment on Heath Pearson History of Political Economy 33 649-654
[6]  
Callahan G(2007)Reconciling Weber and Mises on understanding human action American Journal of Economics and Sociology 66 889-899
[7]  
Dekker E(2018)Schumpeter: Theorist of the avant-garde. The embrace of the new in Schumpeter’s original theory of economic development Review of Austrian Economics 31 177-194
[8]  
Eucken W(1938)Die Überwindung des Historismus Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reiche 62 63-86
[9]  
Hellmich SN(2017)What is socioeconomics? An overview of theories, methods, and themes in the field Forum for Social Economics 46 3-25
[10]  
Kalberg S(1980)Max Weber’s types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history American Journal of Sociology 85 1145-1179