Which sign is more visible? Measuring the visibility of traffic signs through the conspicuity index method

被引：0

作者：

Porathe T. ^{[1
]}

Strand L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Mälardalen University, SE-60531 Eskilstuna

来源：

European Transport Research Review | 2011年 / 3卷 / 1期

关键词：

Conspicuity; Information design; Traffic signs; Visibility;

D O I：

10.1007/s12544-011-0050-9

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose: A new method of measuring visibility taking context into account introduced by Alexander Wertheim has been validated in this study. The purpose was to see if a simple and practical technique could render robust and useful quantitatively measurable results. Methods: An ordinary traffic sign, placed against different backgrounds, was used as a target. Subjects were told to fixate the sign and then slowly deviate with their gaze until they could no longer see the sign in the corner of their eye. This angle was then used as an index for conspicuity. A simple paper and pen method was tested as well as a computer based method. Results: Results for the paper and pen method showed low variance among subjects and a clear correlation between the conspicuity index and intuitive judgments of the visibility of the signs against different backgrounds. For the computer based method the variability was higher but the results still significant between the two groups of dynamic versus static signs. Conclusions: The conclusion is that the conspicuity index method is a simple and useful method that renders quantitative measurements of the visibility of targets taken context into account. © 2011 The Author(s).

引用

页码：35 / 45

页数：10

共 10 条

[1]

Wertheim A.H., A quantitative conspicuity index: theoretical foundation and experimental validation of a measurement procedure, Report C-20 (in Dutch). TNO Human Factors Research Institute, Soesterberg, The Netherlands, (1989)

[2]

Purves D., Augustine G.J., Fitzpatrick D., Katz L.C., Lamanta A.-S., Williams S.M., Neuroscience, (2001)

[3]

Itti L., Koch C., A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention, Vis Res, 40, pp. 1489-1506, (2000)

[4]

Simons D.J., Levin D.T., Failure to detect changes to attended objects, Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 38, (1997)

[5]

Treisman A., Gelade G., A feature integration theory of attention, Cognit Psychol, 12, pp. 97-136, (1980)

[6]

Koch C., Ullman S., Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry, Hum Neurobiol, 4, pp. 219-227, (1985)

[7]

Kooi F.L., Toet A., Conspicuity: an efficient alternative for search time, Vision in Vehicles VII, pp. 451-462, (1999)

[8]

Toet A., Kooi F.L., Bijl P., Valeton J.M., Visual conspicuity determines human target acquisition performance, Opt Eng, 37, 7, pp. 1969-1975, (1998)

[9]

Cook G., Webber G., Gillham S.A., Scouiller S.A., Moseley E., The legibility and conspicuity of emergency escape route signage for people with visual impairments, Int Congr Series, 1282, pp. 1016-1020, (2005)

[10]

Wertheim A.H., Hooge L.T.C., Krikke K., Johnsson A., How important is lateral masking in visual search?, Exp Brain Res, 170, pp. 387-402, (2006)

← 1 →