Laws are conditionals

被引：0

作者：

Toby Friend

机构：

[1] University College London,Science and Technology Studies

来源：

European Journal for Philosophy of Science | 2016年 / 6卷

关键词：

Laws nature; Logical form; Conditionals; System; Equations;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The ubiquitous schema ‘All Fs are Gs’ dominates much philosophical discussion on laws but rarely is it shown how actual laws mentioned and used in science are supposed to fit it. After consideration of a variety of laws, including those obviously conditional and those superficially not conditional (such as equations), I argue that we have good reason to support the traditional interpretation of laws as conditionals of some quantified form with a single object variable. I show how this conclusion impacts on the status of ‘system laws’ and the significance of having only one object variable with regard to the relationship between laws and causal relations.

引用

页码：123 / 144

页数：21

共 24 条

[1]

Bach K(1994)Conversational impliciture Mind and Language 9 124-62

[2]

Beebee H(2011)Necessary connections and the problem of induction Noûs 45 504-527

[3]

Cartwright N(1979)Causal laws and effective strategies Noûs 13 419-437

[4]

Cohen J(2009)A better best systems account of lawhood Philosophical Studies 145 1-34

[5]

Callender C(1967)Causal Relations Journal of Philosophy 64 691-703

[6]

Davidson D(2006)The logical form of universal generalizations Australian Journal of Philosophy 83 373-393

[7]

Drewery A(1991)You can fool some of the people all of the time, everything, else being equal: Hedged laws and psychological explanations Mind 100 19-34

[8]

Fodor J(1948)Studies in the logic of explanation Philosophy of Science 15 135-175

[9]

Hempel C(2014)Ceteris paribus laws in physics Erkenntnis 79 1715-1728

[10]

Oppenheim P(1950)Natural laws and contrary-to-fact conditionals Analysis 10 121-125

← 1 2 3 →