Enabling local political committees to support the implementation of evidence-based practice — a feasibility study

被引:0
作者
Annika Bäck
Henna Hasson
Anna Bergström
机构
[1] Department of Learning,Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine
[2] Informatics,undefined
[3] Management and Ethics,undefined
[4] Medical Management Centre (MMC),undefined
[5] Stockholm Region,undefined
来源
Pilot and Feasibility Studies | / 8卷
关键词
Co-creation; Feasibility; Politicians; Evidence-based practice; Implementation science; Social services;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 153 条
  • [1] Nutley S(2009)Promoting evidence-based practice: models and mechanisms from cross-sector review Res Soc Work Pract 19 552-559
  • [2] Walter I(1999)The conceptual structure of research utilization Res Nurs Heal 22 203-216
  • [3] Davies HTO(2006)Evidence-based practice and policy: choices ahead Res Soc Work Pract 16 338-357
  • [4] Estabrooks CA(2018)What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review Heal Res Policy Syst 16 1-27
  • [5] Gambrill E(2014)A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers BMC Health Serv Res 14 2-23
  • [6] Haynes A(2011)Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors Adm Policy Ment Health 38 4-12
  • [7] Rowbotham SJ(2015)Evidence based policy making and the “art” of commissioning - how English healthcare commissioners access and use information and academic research in “real life” decision-making: an empirical qualitative study BMC Health Serv Res 15 1-106
  • [8] Redman S(2014)Understanding evidence: a statewide survey to explore evidence-informed public health decision-making in a local government setting Implement Sci 9 188-442
  • [9] Brennan S(2004)New evidence on instrumental, conceptual, and symbolic utilization of university research in government agencies Sci Commun 26 75-148
  • [10] Williamson A(2019)The dilemma of knowledge use in political decision-making: national guidelines in a Swedish priority-setting context Heal Econ Policy Law 14 425-483