Parallel effects of aging and time pressure on memory for source: Evidence from the spacing effect

被引:0
作者
Aaron S. Benjamin
Fergus I. M. Craik
机构
[1] University of Toronto and the Rotman Research Institute,Department of Psychology
[2] University of Illinois,undefined
来源
Memory & Cognition | 2001年 / 29卷
关键词
False Alarm; Young Subject; Study List; False Recognition; Source Memory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two experiments address the degree to which item memory-the ability to remember that a word has been presented-is dissociable fromsource memory, or the ability to remember the context of that word’s presentation. Spacing (as opposed to massing) an item’s two presentations leads young adults to endorse that item more often when they are instructed to recognize it and to reject it more often when they are instructed to exclude it. Old adults also enjoy beneficial effects of spacing when the item is to be recognized, but suffer detrimental effects of the spacing manipulation when the item is to be rejected: They falsely endorse thespaced to-be-rejected items more than themassed ones. This dissociation also obtains with young subjects under conditions of increased time pressure: Under normal decision conditions, the ability to endorse to-be-recognized items and to reject to-be-rejected items increases with spacing; under speeded conditions, the ability to reject the latter items decreases with spacing. The results support the notion that source memory is selectively impaired in the elderly and that it is difficult to access mnemonic information about source under time pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:691 / 697
页数:6
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Balota D. A.(1989)Age-related differences in the impact of spacing, lag, and retention interval Psychology & Aging 4 3-9
[2]  
Duchek J. M.(1991)False recency and false fame of faces in young adulthood and old age Memory & Cognition 19 177-188
[3]  
Paullin R.(2000)Dissociating recognition speed and accuracy for words rehearsed via primary versus secondary rehearsal Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 26 638-648
[4]  
Bartlett J. C.(1997)False recognition after a right frontal lobe infarction: Memory for general and specific information Neuropsychologia 35 1035-1049
[5]  
Strater L.(1988)Discovering functionally independent mental processes: The principle of reversed association Psychological Review 95 91-101
[6]  
Fulton A.(1976)Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior 15 1-16
[7]  
Benjamin A. S.(1989)Aging and source monitoring Psychology & Aging 4 106-112
[8]  
Bjork R. A.(1994)Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall Journal of Memory & Language 33 1-18
[9]  
Curran T.(1991)A process-dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory Journal of Memory & Language 30 513-541
[10]  
Schacter D. L.(1999)Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 25 3-22