Prospect and Markowitz stochastic dominance

被引:51
作者
Wong W.-K. [1 ]
Chan R.H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Risk Management Institute, Department of Economics, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570
[2] Department of Mathematics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin
关键词
Markowitz stochastic dominance; Prospect stochastic dominance; Reverse S-shaped utility function; Risk averse; Risk seeking; S-shaped utility function;
D O I
10.1007/s10436-007-0072-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Levy and Wiener (J Risk Uncertain 16(2), 147-163, 1998), Levy and Lev y (Manage Sci 48(10), 133-1349, 2002; Rev Fin Stud 17(4), 1015-1041, 200 4) develop the prospect and Markowitz stochastic dominance theory with S-shaped and reverse S-shaped utility functions for investors. In this paper, we extend their work on prospect stochastic dominance theory (PSD) and Markowitz stochastic dominance theory (MSD) to the first three orders and link the corresponding S-shaped and reverse S-shaped utility functions to the first three orders. We also provide experiments to illustrate each case of the MSD and PSD to the first three orders and demonstrate that the higher order MSD and PSD cannot be replaced by the lower order MSD and PSD. Furthermore, we formulate the following PSD and MSD properties: hierarchy exists in both PSD and MSD relationships; arbitrage opportunities exist in the first orders of both PSD and MSD; and for any two prospects under certain conditions, their third order MSD preference will be 'the opposite of' or 'the same as' their counterpart third order PSD preference. By extending the work of Levy and Wiener and Levy and Levy, we provide investors with more tools to identify the first and third order PSD and MSD prospects and thus they could make wiser choices on their investment decision. © Springer-Verlag 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 129
页数:24
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Anderson G.J., Toward an empirical analysis of polarization, J Econ, 122, pp. 1-26, (2004)
[2]  
Anscombe F.J., Aumann R.J., A definition of subjective probability, Ann Math Stat, 34, 1, pp. 199-205, (1963)
[3]  
Arrow K.J., Essays in the Theory of Risk-bearing, (1971)
[4]  
Barberis N., Huang M., Santos T., Prospect theory and asset prices, Q J Econ, 116, pp. 1-53, (2001)
[5]  
Bawa V.S., Safety-first, stochastic dominance, and optimal portfolio choice, J Fin Quant Anal, 13, pp. 255-271, (1978)
[6]  
Benartzi S., Thaler R., Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle, Q J Econ, 110, 1, pp. 73-92, (1995)
[7]  
Broll U., Wahl J.E., Wong W.K., Elasticity of risk aversion and international trade, Econ Lett, 91, 1, pp. 126-130, (2006)
[8]  
Falk H., Levy H., Market reaction to quarterly earnings' announcements: A stochastic dominance based test of market efficiency, Manage Sci, 35, 4, pp. 425-446, (1989)
[9]  
Fishburn P.C., Decision and Value Theory, (1964)
[10]  
Fishburn P.C., Kochenberger G.A., Two-piece Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions, Decis Sci, 10, pp. 503-518, (1979)