External quality assessment (EQA) for tumor mutational burden: results of an international IQN path feasibility pilot scheme

被引:0
作者
Riziero Esposito Abate
Melanie H. Cheetham
Jennifer A. Fairley
Raffaella Pasquale
Alessandra Sacco
Wolstenholme Nicola
Zandra C. Deans
Simon J. Patton
Nicola Normanno
机构
[1] Istituto Nazionale Tumori “Fondazione G. Pascale”-IRCCS,Cell Biology and Biotherapy Unit
[2] European Molecular Genetics Quality Network (EMQN),GenQA, Department of Laboratory Medicine
[3] Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh,undefined
[4] Little France Crescent,undefined
来源
Virchows Archiv | 2023年 / 482卷
关键词
External quality assessment; Predictive biomarkers; Tumor mutational burden; TMB testing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has recently been approved as an agnostic biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, methods for TMB testing have not yet been standardized. The International Quality Network for Pathology (IQNPath) organized a pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme for TMB testing. The aim of this program was the validation of the materials and the procedures for the EQA of this complex biomarker. Five formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell lines were selected to mimic the various TMB values observed in clinical practice. The FFPE samples were tested with the FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) assay as the reference test and three commercially available targeted sequencing panels. Following this internal validation, the five cell lines were sent to 29 laboratories selected on the basis of a previous survey. Nineteen of the 23 laboratories that submitted results (82.6%) used targeted sequencing for TMB estimation. Only two laboratories performed whole exome sequencing (WES) and two assessed TMB by clinical exome. A high variability in the reported TMB values was observed. The variability was higher for samples with the highest TMB value according to the F1CDx test. However, good reproducibility of the TMB score was shown by laboratories using the same panel. The majority of laboratories did not indicate a TMB cut-off value for clinical interpretation. In conclusion, this pilot EQA scheme suggests that it is feasible to run such an EQA program for TMB assessment. However, the results of our pilot highlight the numerous challenges for the standardization of this test.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 355
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Chalmers ZR(2017)Analysis of 100,000 human cancer genomes reveals the landscape of tumor mutational burden Genome Med 9 34-264
[2]  
Pardoll DM(2012)The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 12 252-1412
[3]  
Lemery S(2017)First FDA Approval Agnostic of Cancer Site - When a Biomarker Defines the Indication N Engl J Med 377 1409-852 e4
[4]  
Keegan P(2018)Genomic Features of Response to Combination Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Cell 33 843-56
[5]  
Pazdur R(2019)Development of tumor mutation burden as an immunotherapy biomarker: utility for the oncology clinic Ann Oncol 30 44-2199
[6]  
Hellmann MD(2014)Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma N Engl J Med 371 2189-750
[7]  
Chan TA(2014)Neo-antigens predicted by tumor genome meta-analysis correlate with increased patient survival Genome Res 24 743-74
[8]  
Snyder A(2015)Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy Science 348 69-573
[9]  
Brown SD(2019)Implementing TMB measurement in clinical practice: considerations on assay requirements ESMO Open 4 571-421
[10]  
Schumacher TN(2021)Strength in numbers: predicting response to checkpoint inhibitors from large clinical datasets Cell 184 415-144