Differentiation of Photoperiod-Induced ABA and Soluble Sugar Responses of Two Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Cultivars

被引:0
作者
Mira Arpe Bendevis
Yujie Sun
Sergey Shabala
Eva Rosenqvist
Fulai Liu
Sven-Erik Jacobsen
机构
[1] University of Copenhagen,Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science
[2] University of Tasmania,School of Agricultural Science
来源
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation | 2014年 / 33卷
关键词
Abscisic acid; Crop adaptation; Day-length; Photoperiod; Phytohormones;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Adaptation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to new regions demands acclimation to day-length, in addition to a host of other abiotic factors. To further elucidate the effects of photoperiod on development of quinoa, two differently adapted cultivars, Achachino (short day) from Bolivia and Titicaca (day-length neutral), were subjected to continuous long (17.5 h) and short (10 h) photoperiod conditions as well as a shift between the two to trigger possible adaptive mechanisms initiated by changes in leaf soluble sugar and ABA concentration. Our findings show both cultivars responding to an increase in photoperiod with significant increases in soluble sugar concentrations and a simultaneous increase in ABA. However, Titicaca exhibited a much stronger ABA response to increase in photoperiod, whereas the increase for Achachino falls within the range of natural diurnal variation. Achachino also showed increasing sensitivity to long photoperiods throughout all reproductive growth stages, resulting in continued flowering, stem elongation and disruption of seed formation, whereas Titicaca was capable of maintaining full seed set under all the photoperiod conditions. Discernible photoperiod-dependent chlorosis of the lower leaves of Titicaca was observed under long photoperiods compared to short photoperiods, implying multi-faceted adaptive responses to changes in photoperiod which may also involve nitrogen and carbon dynamics. Both ABA and sugar signals are possibly involved in regulating the photoperiod-adaptive capability of each cultivar, leading to pronounced differences in growth and reproductive development patterns between the contrasting cultivars.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 570
页数:8
相关论文
共 113 条
  • [1] Adolf VI(2012)Varietal differences of quinoa’s tolerance to saline conditions Plant Soil 15 119-129
  • [2] Shabala S(2001)Ovary abscisic acid concentration does not induce kernel abortion in field-grown maize subjected to drought Eur J Agron 60 231-243
  • [3] Andersen MN(1999)Photoperiod-sensitive development phases in quinoa ( Field Crop Res 89 299-318
  • [4] Razzaghi F(2004) Willd.) Field Crop Res 60 539-544
  • [5] Jacobsen S-E(2010)Genotype and genotype-by-environment interaction effects for grain yield and grain size of quinoa ( Acta Agr Scand 45 154-161
  • [6] Asch F(2005) Willd.) as revealed by pattern analysis of multi-environmental trials Colloid Surf B 12 178-184
  • [7] Andersen MN(2009)Photoperiodic effect on flowering and seed development in quinoa ( Curr Opin Plant Biol 5 e14012-37
  • [8] Jensen CR(2010) Willd.) PLoS One 24 29-32
  • [9] Mogensen VO(1996)Molecular mechanisms of phytochrome signal transduction in higher plants New Zeal J Crop Hort 5 26-180
  • [10] Bertero HD(2001)Regulation of flowering in temperate cereals Curr Opin Plant Biol 36 175-106