Effects of build orientation on tensile strength for stereolithography-manufactured ASTM D-638 type I specimens

被引:1
作者
Rolando Quintana
Jae-Won Choi
Karina Puebla
Ryan Wicker
机构
[1] University of Texas at San Antonio,Department of Management Science and Statistics
[2] University of Texas at El Paso,undefined
来源
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | 2010年 / 46卷
关键词
Rapid prototyping; Stereolithography; Design of experiments; Tensile testing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A statistical design of experiments (DOE) approach was used to determine if specific build orientation parameters impacted mechanical strength of stereolithography (SL) fabricated parts. A single platform (25.4 × 25.4-cm cross-section) on the 3D Systems Viper si2 SL machine was designed to hold 18 ASTM D-638 type I samples manufactured in different orientations. The DOE tested three factors: axis, layout, and position. Samples were fabricated parallel with the x-axis or y-axis, or 45° to both axes (called axes 1, 2, and 3, respectively). For each axis, samples were fabricated either flat or on an edge relative to the x–y plane (called layouts 1 and 2, respectively). Three samples were manufactured for each layout and axis combination, and the samples were labeled as positions 1, 2, or 3 depending on the distance from the center of the platform with position 1 being the closest to the center. The results from the statistical analyses showed that axis and position had no significant effect on ultimate tensile stress (UTS) or modulus of elasticity in tension (E). However, layout (or whether a sample was built flat or on an edge) was shown to have a statistically significant effect on UTS and E (at a 95% level of confidence). The differences between average UTS and E for each of the samples built flat and on an edge were ~3.53% (43.2 versus 44.8 MPa) and ~4.59% (763.9 versus 800.7 MPa), respectively. Because of the relatively small differences in means for UTS and E, the statistical differences between layout most likely would not have been identified without performing the multifactor analysis of variance. Furthermore, layout was the only factor that tested different orientations of build layers (or layer-to-layer interfaces) with respect to the sample part, and thus, it appears that the orientation of the build layer (layer-to-layer interfaces) with respect to the fabricated part has a significant effect on the resulting mechanical properties. This study represents one of many to follow that is using statistical analyses to identify and classify important fabrication parameters on mechanical properties for layer-manufactured parts. Although SL is the focus of this work, the techniques developed and presented here can be applied to any layered manufacturing technology producing any ASTM-type specimen with any particular material.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 215
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Byun HS(2005)A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26 1338-1347
  • [2] Lee KH(2007)Decision support tool for selecting fabrication parameters in stereolithography Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33 706-718
  • [3] Giannatsis J(2006)Mesoscale RF relay enabled by integrated rapid manufacturing Rapid Prototyping J 12 148-155
  • [4] Dedoussis V(2005)Embedded micro-channel fabrication using line-scan stereolithography Assem Autom 25 316-329
  • [5] Palmer JA(1999)Characterisation of epoxy resins for microstereolithographic rapid prototyping Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15 281-286
  • [6] Jokiel B(2006)Functionalizing stereolithography resins: effects of dispersed multi-walled carbon nanotubes on physical properties Rapid Prototyping J 5 292-303
  • [7] Nordquist CD(2004)Effects of electroplating on the mechanical properties of stereolithography and laser sintered parts Rapid Prototyping J 10 305-315
  • [8] Kast BA(2002)Dual material rapid prototyping techniques for the development of biomedical devices. Part 2: secondary powder deposition Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19 679-687
  • [9] Atwood CJ(2006)Influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties in stereolithography Rapid Prototyping J 12 106-113
  • [10] Grant E(2006)Optimization of stereolithography process parameters for part strength using design of experiments Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29 79-88