Participatory analysis of vulnerability to drought in three agro-pastoral communities in the West African Sahel

被引:14
作者
Ayantunde A.A. [1 ]
Turner M.D. [2 ]
Kalilou A. [3 ]
机构
[1] International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), c/o CIFOR, Ouagadougou 06
[2] Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, 160 Science Hall, 550 Park Street, Madison, 53711, WI
[3] International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Niamey
关键词
Climate change; Climatic hazards; Participatory approach; Vulnerability; West African Sahel;
D O I
10.1186/s13570-015-0033-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drought is one of the major climatic hazards impacting on the various sectors including crop and livestock in the West African Sahel. Pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in the region are regularly affected by drought, with vulnerability differing with gender, age, wealth status (access to cropland and livestock endowment), geographic location, social networks, and previous exposure to drought. Effective interventions require regular monitoring of vulnerability to drought, for which various quantitative and qualitative approaches exist. Qualitative assessments of vulnerability rely on participatory approaches with emphasis on involvement of the local communities in the analysis of their vulnerability to climate-induced stresses. In this study, we used a participatory approach to assess the vulnerability of three agro-pastoral communities in Niger to drought. The specific objective of this study was to assess the strength and limitation of a participatory vulnerability approach using a case study. According to the respondents in all the study sites, the incidence of drought has become more frequent in the last three decades compared to previous decades (before 1970). The impacts of drought on livelihoods according to the participants included food shortage, famine, forced sale of livestock to buy grain, decimation of livestock herds, and massive exploitation of woody plant species. The main weakness of participatory vulnerability assessments is the scalability of findings, as they are often location-specific. Therefore, participatory assessment should be complemented with more rigorous quantitative approaches to enhance applicability of the results to other locations with similar contexts. © 2015, Ayantunde et al.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [21] Martin R., Miller B., Linstadter A., Frank K., How much climate change can pastoral livelihoods tolerate? Modelling rangeland use and evaluating risk, Global Environmental Change, 24, pp. 183-192, (2014)
  • [22] Miller F., Osbahr H., Boyd E., Thomalla F., Bharwani S., Ziervogel G., Walker B., Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts?, Ecology and Society 15(3): [online], (2010)
  • [23] Moritz M., Kyle B.R., Nolan K.C., Patrick S., Shaffer M.F., Thampy G., Too many people and too few livestock in West Africa? An evaluation of Sandford’s thesis, Journal of Development Studies, 45, pp. 1113-1133, (2009)
  • [24] Mortimore M.J., Tiffen M., Yamba B., Nelson J., Synthèse sur les évolutions à long terme dans le département de Maradi, Niger 1960–2000. Working paper 39f, (2001)
  • [25] Nielsen J.O., Reenberg A., Cultural barriers to climate change adaptation: a case study from Northern Burkina Faso, Global Environmental Change, 20, 1, pp. 142-152, (2010)
  • [26] Nielsen J.O., Reenberg A., Temporality and the problem with singling out climate as a current driver of change in a small West African village, Journal of Arid Environments, 74, 4, pp. 464-474, (2010)
  • [27] O'Brien K., Leichenko R., Kelkar U., Venema H., Aandahl G., Tompkins H.J., Bhadwal S., Barg S., Nygaard L., West J., Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India, Global Environmental Change, 14, pp. 303-313, (2004)
  • [28] O'Brien K., Eriksen S., Nygaard L.P., Schjolden A., Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses, Climate Policy, 7, pp. 73-88, (2007)
  • [29] Opiyo F.E.O., Wasonga O.V., Nyangito M.M., Measuring household vulnerability to climate-induced stresses in pastoral rangelands of Kenya: implications for resilience programming, Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 4, (2014)
  • [30] Prokopy L.S., Mase A.S., Perry-Hill R., Assessing vulnerabilities and adaptation approaches: useful to usable tools, Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences, Climate Vulnerability, 2, pp. 129-137, (2013)