Cefprozil versus Cefuroxime Axetil in the Treatment of Acute Sinusitis

被引:0
作者
Edwin R. Brankston
H.S. Conter
R. Corriveau
J.M. Martel
C. Laroche
R. Roy
C. Savard
D. Roy
R. Kelly
P. Forget
M. Rivard
F. Boulerice
机构
[1] Oshawa Clinic,
[2] Gladstone Professional Centre,undefined
[3] Clinique Médicale Cadillac,undefined
[4] Parkdale Clinic,undefined
[5] CLSC Verdun,undefined
[6] Notre-Dame Hospital,undefined
[7] Centre Médical Pierrefonds,undefined
[8] Clinique Médicale Adoncour,undefined
[9] University of Montréal,undefined
[10] Bristol-Myers Squibb,undefined
来源
Clinical Drug Investigation | 1998年 / 15卷
关键词
Adis International Limited; Sinusitis; Cefuroxime; Drug Invest; Acute Sinusitis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this multicentre, randomised, open-label, general practice (GP) study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cefprozil (Cefzil™, Bristol-Myers Squibb) compared with that of cefuroxime axetil (Ceftin®, Glaxo Wellcome) in the treatment of adult subjects with acute sinusitis. Typical of the GP setting, diagnosis was made based solely on clinical signs and symptoms of acute disease. Sinus radiography was performed post-randomisation. A total of 381 adolescent and adult patients were randomly assigned to 10 days’ treatment with either cefprozil, 500mg orally twice daily (n = 191), or cefuroxime axetil, 250mg orally twice daily (n = 190). Based on predefined criteria, treatments were found to be equally effective in terms of proportions of patients in the per-protocol population that were cured, improved or failed (p = 0.20). Similar results were observed when the evaluation was performed on the subset of patients with radiographic evidence of sinusitis and when the evaluation was based on the investigator's judgement. Similar rates of adverse events were observed in the two treatment groups.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 90
页数:9
相关论文
共 106 条
  • [1] Williams J.W.(1993)Does this patient have sinusitis? Diagnosing acute sinusitis by history and physical examination JAMA 270 1242-6
  • [2] Simel D.L.(1975)Sinusitis of the maxillary antrum N Engl J Med 293 735-9
  • [3] Evans F.O.(1979)Etiology and antimicrobial therapy of acute maxillary sinusitis J Infect Dis 139 197-202
  • [4] Sydnor J.B.(1992)The microbial etiology and antimicrobial therapy of adults with acute community-acquired sinusitis: a fifteen-year experience at the University of Virginia and review of other selected studies J Allergy Clin Immunol 90 457-62
  • [5] Moore W.E.C.(1983)Clinical aspects on upper respiratory tract infections} Scand J Infect Dis 39 14-8
  • [6] Hamory B.H.(1976)The incidence of aetiology of respiratory tract infections in general practice — with emphasis on Infection 4 40-25
  • [7] Sande M.A.(1992)Use of symptoms and signs to diagnose maxillary sinusitis in general practice. Comparison with ultrasonography BMJ 305 684-S14
  • [8] Sydnor A.(1996)Acute community-acquired sinusitis Clin Infect Dis 23 1209-8
  • [9] Gwaltney J.M.(1997)Apractical guide for the diagnosis and treatment of acute sinusitis Can Med Assoc J 156 S1-7
  • [10] Scheid W.M.(1995)Sinusitis. A review for generalists West J Med 163 40-71