Constructing high quality use case models: a systematic review of current practices

被引:0
|
作者
Mohamed El-Attar
James Miller
机构
[1] King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals,Department of Information and Computer Science
[2] University of Alberta,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
来源
Requirements Engineering | 2012年 / 17卷
关键词
Use cases; Anti-patterns; UML; Systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There is an increasing recognition for the need to develop high quality use case models from the professional and academic communities. Quality in use case models is of particular importance when they are utilized within a use case driven development process, whereby every aspect of development is driven by the models and influenced by their quality. Many practitioners and researchers have provided guidelines, suggestions and techniques to construct high quality use case models. This invaluable body of knowledge is disseminated across numerous literature resources. Without unifying this knowledge into one resource, it cannot be expected that a use case modeler would be fully aware of the entire body of knowledge and benefitting from it. This paper presents a systematic review that was conducted in order to identify and amalgamate this knowledge. The amalgamated knowledge is presented in a unified form, specifically as a set of 26 anti-patterns, which modelers can use to improve the quality of their models.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 201
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Constructing high quality use case models: a systematic review of current practices
    El-Attar, Mohamed
    Miller, James
    REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING, 2012, 17 (03) : 187 - 201
  • [2] Improving the quality of use case models using antipatterns
    Mohamed El-Attar
    James Miller
    Software & Systems Modeling, 2010, 9 : 141 - 160
  • [3] Improving the quality of use case models using antipatterns
    El-Attar, Mohamed
    Miller, James
    SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2010, 9 (02) : 141 - 160
  • [4] Machine Learning Models to Forecast Outcomes of Pituitary Surgery: A Systematic Review in Quality of Reporting and Current Evidence
    Rech, Matheus M.
    de Macedo Filho, Leonardo
    White, Alexandra J.
    Perez-Vega, Carlos
    Samson, Susan L.
    Chaichana, Kaisorn L.
    Olomu, Osarenoma U.
    Quinones-Hinojosa, Alfredo
    Almeida, Joao Paulo
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [5] A systematic review on the use of best practices for publishing linked data
    Feitosa, Danila
    Dermeval, Diego
    Avila, Thiago
    Bittencourt, Ig Ibert
    Loscio, Bernadette Farias
    Isotani, Seiji
    ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2018, 42 (01) : 107 - 123
  • [6] The role of the dietitian in the management of malnutrition in the elderly: A systematic review of current practices
    Fleurke, Matthijs
    Voskuil, Dorien W.
    Kolmer, Deirdre M. Beneken Genaamd
    NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2020, 77 (01) : 60 - 75
  • [7] Heart failure and atrial flutter: a systematic review of current knowledge and practices
    Diamant, Michael J.
    Andrade, Jason G.
    Virani, Sean A.
    Jhund, Pardeep S.
    Petrie, Mark C.
    Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2022, 8 (06): : 4484 - 4496
  • [8] Heart failure and atrial flutter: a systematic review of current knowledge and practices
    Diamant, Michael J.
    Andrade, Jason G.
    Virani, Sean A.
    Jhund, Pardeep S.
    Petrie, Mark C.
    Hawkins, Nathaniel M.
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (06): : 4484 - 4496
  • [9] Best Practices for the Provision of Virtual Care: A Systematic Review of Current Guidelines
    Anvari, Sama
    Neumark, Samuel
    Jangra, Rhea
    Sandre, Anthony
    Pasumarthi, Keerthana
    Xenodemetropoulos, Ted
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2023, 29 (01) : 3 - 22
  • [10] A systematic review of current osteoporotic metaphyseal fracture animal models
    Wong, R. M. Y.
    Choy, M. H. V.
    Li, M. C. M.
    Leung, K-S.
    Chow, S. K-H.
    Cheung, W-H.
    Cheng, J. C. Y.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (01): : 6 - 11