Clipping versus coiling in posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis

被引：9

作者：

Tsianaka E. ^{[1
,5
]}

Al-Shawish A. ^{[2
]}

Potapov A. ^{[3
]}

Fountas K. ^{[1
]}

Spyrou M. ^{[4
]}

Konovalov N. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Viopolis, Larissa

[2] Department of Neurosurgery, Ibn Sina Hospital, Sabah Medical Area, Shuwaikh

[3] Department of Neurotraumatology, N.N. Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute, 16 4th Tverskaya - Yamskaya Str., Moscow

[4] Department of Neurosurgery, Ygeia Private Hospital, Golgon 33, Limassol

[5] Department of Spine Neurosurgery, N.N. Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute, 16 4th Tverskaya - Yamskaya Str., Moscow

来源：

Chinese Neurosurgical Journal | / 5卷 / 1期

关键词：

Clipping; Coiling; Intracranial aneurysms; Meta-analysis; Posterior circulation;

D O I：

10.1186/s41016-019-0163-x

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Background: Posterior circulation intracranial aneurysm (IA) treatment remains challenging, due to the anatomy of the area and the high rupture possibility. Endovascular treatment seems to be more suitable for these aneurysms, but studies focused on endovascular treatment demonstrate a high rate of re-intervention needing. A meta-analysis might offer a clearer view, being useful in a more effective treatment planning. Methods: A systematic search was performed, using the PubMed database platform. The final article pool contained 20 articles. Studied parameters were operative mortality, late mortality, permanent neurologic deficit (PND), and the need for re-intervention (Re-int). We divided patients into two subgroups, those with ruptured and those with unruptured aneurysm. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate software. Results: In the total population (645 patients), there was a superiority of coiling over clipping in terms of PND and of coiling in terms of Re-int. As regards mortality, there was no clear superiority of one method over the other. Conclusions: The current study came to the conclusion that there is a superiority of coiling over clipping in terms of PND. On the other hand, clipping seems to be superior to coiling in terms of the need for re-intervention. As regards mortality (both operative and late), there is no clear superiority of one method over the other. Studying subgroups of patients (ruptured and unruptured posterior circulation IAs), in terms of PND, there is no superiority of one method over the other. The same goes for Op-Mo on ruptured aneurysms. © 2019 The Author(s).

引用

共 38 条

[1]

Linn F.H., Rinkel G.J., Algra A., Van Gijn J., Incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage: Role of region, year, and rate of computed tomography: A meta-analysis, Stroke, 27, 4, pp. 625-629, (1996)

[2]

Brown R.D., Unruptured intracranial aneurysms, Semin Neurol, 30, 5, pp. 537-544, (2010)

[3]

Zhao J., Wang S., Yang L., Zhao Y., Clinical experience of 153 patients with posterior circulation aneurysms, J Clin Neurosci, 12, pp. 17-20, (2005)

[4]

Bonneville F., Sourour N., Biondi A., Intracranial aneurysms: An overview, Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 16, 3, pp. 371-382, (2006)

[5]

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms - Risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention, N Engl J Med, 339, pp. 1725-1733, (1998)

[6]

Lempert T.E., Malek A.M., Halbach V.V., Phatouros C.C., Meyers P.M., Dowd C.F., Et al., Endovascular treatment of ruptured posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms. Clinical and angiographic outcomes, Stroke, 31, pp. 100-110, (2000)

[7]

Ferns S., Sprengers M., Van Rooij W., Rinkel G., Van Rijn J., Bipat S., Sluzewski M., Majoie C., Coiling of intracranial aneurysms - A systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates, Stroke, 40, pp. e523-e529, (2009)

[8]

Liberati A., Altman D.G., Tetzlaff J., Mulrow C., Gotzsche P.C., Et al., The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration, PLoS Med, 6, 7, (2009)

[9]

Molyneux A., Kerr R., Stratton I., Sandercock P., Clarke M., Shrimpton J., Holman R., International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group: International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomized trial, Lancet, 360, pp. 1267-1274, (2002)

[10]

Molyneux A., Kerr R., Yu L.M., Clarke M., Sneade M., Yarnold J., Sandercock P., For the iInternational Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A randomized comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion, Lancet, 366, pp. 809-817, (2005)

← 1 2 3 4 →