Enhancing Decision-Making in STSE Education by Inducing Reflection and Self-Regulated Learning

被引:0
作者
Helge Gresch
Marcus Hasselhorn
Susanne Bögeholz
机构
[1] University of Münster,Center for Biology Education
[2] German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF),Biology Education
[3] University of Göttingen,DFG Graduate Research Program 1195 ‘Understanding and Enhancing Educational Fit in Schools’
[4] University of Göttingen,undefined
来源
Research in Science Education | 2017年 / 47卷
关键词
Decision-making; STSE education; Socioscientific issues; Education for sustainable development; Self-regulated learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Thoughtful decision-making to resolve socioscientific issues is central to science, technology, society, and environment (STSE) education. One approach for attaining this goal involves fostering students’ decision-making processes. Thus, the present study explores whether the application of decision-making strategies, combined with reflections on the decision-making processes of others, enhances decision-making competence. In addition, this study examines whether this process is supported by elements of self-regulated learning, i.e., self-reflection regarding one’s own performance and the setting of goals for subsequent tasks. A computer-based training program which involves the resolution of socioscientific issues related to sustainable development was developed in two versions: with and without elements of self-regulated learning. Its effects on decision-making competence were analyzed using a pre test-post test follow-up control-group design (N = 242 high school students). Decision-making competence was assessed using an open-ended questionnaire that focused on three facets: consideration of advantages and disadvantages, metadecision aspects, and reflection on the decision-making processes of others. The findings suggest that students in both training groups incorporated aspects of metadecision into their statements more often than students in the control group. Furthermore, both training groups were more successful in reflecting on the decision-making processes of others. The students who received additional training in self-regulated learning showed greater benefits in terms of metadecision aspects and reflection, and these effects remained significant two months later. Overall, our findings demonstrate that the application of decision-making strategies, combined with reflections on the decision-making process and elements of self-regulated learning, is a fruitful approach in STSE education.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 118
页数:23
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Aikenhead GS(1985)Collective decision making in the social context of science Science Education 69 453-475
[2]  
Arvai JL(2003)Testing alternative decision approaches for identifying cleanup priorities at contaminated sites Environmental Science & Technology 37 1469-1476
[3]  
Gregory R(2004)Teaching students to make better decisions about the environment: lessons from the decision sciences The Journal of Environmental Education 36 33-44
[4]  
Arvai JL(2003)Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues Science Education 87 352-377
[5]  
Campbell VEA(1999)Self-regulated learning: where we are today International Journal of Educational Research 31 445-457
[6]  
Baird A(2000)Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms Science Education 84 287-312
[7]  
Rivers L(2006)Göttinger Modell der Bewertungskompetenz—Teilkompetenz “Bewerten, Entscheiden und Reflektieren” für Gestaltungsaufgaben Nachhaltiger Entwicklung (Göttingen’s model of decision-making competence - subcompetence “evaluating, deciding and reflecting” in tasks related to sustainable development Journal of Teaching Methods of Natural Sciences 12 177-199
[8]  
Bell RL(2010)Students’ use of decision-making strategies with regard to socioscientific issues: an application of the Rasch partial credit model Science Education 94 230-258
[9]  
Lederman NG(2008)Entscheidungen treffen—wie man vorgehen kann (Decision-making - how to proceed) Teaching Biology 336 13-18
[10]  
Boekaerts M(2010)Förderung von Bewertungskompetenz im Biologieunterricht durch zusätzliche metakognitive Strukturierungshilfen beim kooperativen Lernen—Ein Beispiel für Veränderungsmessungen (The effects of metacognitive instruction on students’ socioscientific decision making - an exemplary procedure for measurement of change) Journal of Teaching Methods of Natural Sciences 16 299-314