Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine, busulfan, and thiotepa conditioning is associated with favorable outcomes in myelofibrosis

被引:0
作者
Roni Shouval
Yakov Vega
Joshua A. Fein
Ivetta Danylesko
Noga Shem Tov
Ronit Yerushalmi
Marta Sobas
Anna Czyż
Arnon Nagler
Avichai Shimoni
机构
[1] Tel Aviv University,Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center
[2] Chaim Sheba Medical Center,Dr. Pinchas Bornstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program
[3] Wroclaw Medical University,Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2020年 / 55卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative therapy for myelofibrosis. The optimal conditioning regimen has not been well defined. We retrospectively compared transplantation outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis (n = 67) conditioned with myeloablative (MAC, 36%) and reduced-intensity (RIC, 46%) regimens, and more recently with the combination of thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF, 18%). Patients were transplanted from HLA-matched sibling (n = 26) or unrelated donors (n = 41) between the years 2003 and 2018. The median follow-up was 2.9 years for all patients but shorter in the TBF group (1.1 years). The probability of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 43%. At 1 year, the rate of PFS was 80%, 54%, and 45% with TBF, MAC, and RIC, respectively (p = 0.031). In a multivariable model, there was a greater risk for death with MAC (hazard ratio [HR] 12.26, p = 0.026) and lower PFS with both MAC (hazard ratio [HR] 7.78, p = 0.017) and RIC (HR 5.43, p = 0.027) compared with TBF. Relapse was higher with RIC (HR 8.20, p = 0.043) while nonrelapse mortality was increased with MAC (HR 9.63 p = 0.049). Our results indicate that TBF is a promising preparative regimen in myelofibrosis patients transplanted from matched sibling or unrelated donors, and should be further explored.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 156
页数:9
相关论文
共 226 条
  • [21] Deeg JH(2013)Unmanipulated haploidentical bone marrow transplantation and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide for hematologic malignancies after myeloablative conditioning Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 19 117-93
  • [22] Olavarria E(2018)Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine compared to busulfan-fludarabine for sibling and unrelated donor transplant in acute myeloid leukemia in first remission Oncotarget 9 3379-9
  • [23] Niederwieser D(2018)Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine compared to busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplant from matched siblings and unrelated donors for acute myeloid leukemia Am J Hematol 93 1211-33
  • [24] Bacigalupo A(2009)Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 15 1628-56
  • [25] Barbui T(2005)National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 11 945-15
  • [26] Kroger N(2019)Thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine conditioning regimen in T cell-replete HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 25 1407-940
  • [27] Giorgino T(2019)Busulfan- or Thiotepa-Based Conditioning in Myelofibrosis: A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study from the GITMO Group Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 25 932-67
  • [28] Scott BL(2010)Outcome of transplantation for myelofibrosis Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16 358-9
  • [29] Ditschkowski M(2016)Improved outcome of alternative donor transplantations in patients with myelofibrosis: from unrelated to haploidentical family donors Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 22 324-528
  • [30] Alchalby H(2019)Family Mismatched Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: Report from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 25 522-87