Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with fludarabine, busulfan, and thiotepa conditioning is associated with favorable outcomes in myelofibrosis

被引:0
作者
Roni Shouval
Yakov Vega
Joshua A. Fein
Ivetta Danylesko
Noga Shem Tov
Ronit Yerushalmi
Marta Sobas
Anna Czyż
Arnon Nagler
Avichai Shimoni
机构
[1] Tel Aviv University,Division of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Chaim Sheba Medical Center
[2] Chaim Sheba Medical Center,Dr. Pinchas Bornstein Talpiot Medical Leadership Program
[3] Wroclaw Medical University,Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms and Bone Marrow Transplantation
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2020年 / 55卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a curative therapy for myelofibrosis. The optimal conditioning regimen has not been well defined. We retrospectively compared transplantation outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis (n = 67) conditioned with myeloablative (MAC, 36%) and reduced-intensity (RIC, 46%) regimens, and more recently with the combination of thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF, 18%). Patients were transplanted from HLA-matched sibling (n = 26) or unrelated donors (n = 41) between the years 2003 and 2018. The median follow-up was 2.9 years for all patients but shorter in the TBF group (1.1 years). The probability of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 43%. At 1 year, the rate of PFS was 80%, 54%, and 45% with TBF, MAC, and RIC, respectively (p = 0.031). In a multivariable model, there was a greater risk for death with MAC (hazard ratio [HR] 12.26, p = 0.026) and lower PFS with both MAC (hazard ratio [HR] 7.78, p = 0.017) and RIC (HR 5.43, p = 0.027) compared with TBF. Relapse was higher with RIC (HR 8.20, p = 0.043) while nonrelapse mortality was increased with MAC (HR 9.63 p = 0.049). Our results indicate that TBF is a promising preparative regimen in myelofibrosis patients transplanted from matched sibling or unrelated donors, and should be further explored.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 156
页数:9
相关论文
共 226 条
  • [1] Arber DA(2016)The2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia Blood 127 2391-405
  • [2] Orazi A(2000)Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia New Engl J Med 342 1255-65
  • [3] Hasserjian R(2012)A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis N Engl J Med 366 799-807
  • [4] Thiele J(2012)JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis N Engl J Med 366 787-98
  • [5] Borowitz MJ(2015)Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group Leukemia 29 2126-33
  • [6] Le Beau MM(2015)Impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on survival of patients less than 65 years of age with primary myelofibrosis Blood 125 3347-50
  • [7] Tefferi A(2010)A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment) Blood 115 1703-8
  • [8] Verstovsek S(2011)DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status J Clin Oncol 29 392-7
  • [9] Mesa RA(2018)MIPSS70+ version 2.0: Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis J Clin Oncol 36 1769-70
  • [10] Gotlib J(1999)Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle, Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto del Midollo Osseo, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Collaborative Study Blood 93 2831-8