MR-guided Focused Ultrasound Facilitates Sonodynamic Therapy with 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in a Rat Glioma Model

被引:0
作者
Sheng-Kai Wu
Marc A. Santos
Stuart L. Marcus
Kullervo Hynynen
机构
[1] Physical Sciences Platform,Department of Medical Biophysics
[2] Sunnybrook Research Institute,Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering
[3] University of Toronto,undefined
[4] Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc.,undefined
[5] University of Toronto,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) continues to have a dismal prognosis and significant efforts are being made to develop more effective treatment methods. Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is an emerging modality for cancer treatment which combines ultrasound with sonosensitizers to produce a localized cytotoxic effect. It has long been known that ultrasound exposure can cause both thermal and non-thermal bioeffects and it remains an open question to what degree does temperature impact the efficacy of SDT. In order to optimize the ultrasound parameters of SDT, transcranial MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) and real-time MRI thermometry were used to monitor the therapy in a rat brain tumor model. Experiments were performed using a C6 intracranial glioma tumor model in 37 male Sprague Dawley rats. Treatments were performed about 7 days following tumor implantation when the tumor reached 1–3 mm in diameter as determined by MRI. 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was injected at a dose of 60 mg/kg six hours before sonication. MRgFUS at 1.06 MHz was delivered continuously at an in situ spatial-peak temporal-average intensity of 5.5 W/cm2 for 20 min. MR thermometry was acquired to monitor the temperature change in the brain during sonication. The tumor growth response for animals receiving 5-ALA alone, FUS alone, 5-ALA + FUS and a sham control group were evaluated with MRI every week following treatment. During 20 min of MRgFUS at 5.5 W/cm2, the temperature within the targeted brain tumor was elevated from 32.3 ± 0.5 °C and 37.2 ± 0.7 °C to 33.2 ± 0.9 °C and 38.4 ± 1.1 °C, respectively. Both the tumor growth inhibition and survival were significantly improved in the 5-ALA + FUS group with 32 °C or 37 °C as the starting core body (rectal) temperature. 5-ALA alone and FUS alone did not improve survival. These promising results indicate that relatively low power continuous wave transcranial MRgFUS in conjunction with 5-ALA can produce an inhibitory effect on rat brain tumor growth in the absence of thermal dose. Further investigation of the ultrasound parameters is needed to improve the therapeutic efficacy of MRgFUS and 5-ALA.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Ostrom QT(2014)CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2007–2011 Neuro Oncol 16 iv1-63
  • [2] Rodriguez N(2013)Five-year outcomes, cosmesis, and toxicity with 3-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87 1051-1057
  • [3] Ricard D(2012)Primary brain tumours in adults Lancet 379 1984-1996
  • [4] Huang Z(2008)Photodynamic therapy for treatment of solid tumors–potential and technical challenges Technol Cancer Res Treat 7 309-320
  • [5] Umemura S(1990)Mechanism of cell damage by ultrasound in combination with hematoporphyrin Jpn J Cancer Res 81 962-966
  • [6] Yumita N(1989)Hematoporphyrin as a sensitizer of cell-damaging effect of ultrasound Jpn J Cancer Res 80 219-222
  • [7] Nishigaki R(2009)Sonodynamic therapy consisting of focused ultrasound and a photosensitizer causes a selective antitumor effect in a rat intracranial glioma model Anticancer Res 29 943-950
  • [8] Umemura K(2007)Comparison between sonodynamic effect with protoporphyrin IX and hematoporphyrin on sarcoma 180 Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 60 671-680
  • [9] Yumita N(2015)Mechanical high-intensity focused ultrasound destruction of soft tissue: working mechanisms and physiologic effects Ultrasound Med Biol 41 1500-1517
  • [10] Nishigaki R(2014)The promise of sonodynamic therapy Cancer Metastasis Rev 33 143-160