Engel on pragmatic encroachment and epistemic value

被引:0
作者
Duncan Pritchard
机构
[1] University of Edinburgh,
来源
Synthese | 2017年 / 194卷
关键词
Epistemic value; Epistemology; Knowledge; Pragmatic encroachment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
I discuss Engel’s (2009) critique of pragmatic encroachment in epistemology and his related discussion of epistemic value. While I am sympathetic to Engel’s remarks on the former, I think he makes a crucial misstep when he relates this discussion to the latter topic. The goal of this paper is to offer a better articulation of the relationship between these two epistemological issues, with the ultimate goal of lending further support to Engel’s scepticism about pragmatic encroachment in epistemology. As we will see, key to this articulation will be the drawing of a distinction between two importantly different ways of thinking about epistemic value.
引用
收藏
页码:1477 / 1486
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Fantl J(2002)Evidence pragmatics and justification Philosophical Review 111 67-94
  • [2] McGrath M(2007)On pragmatic encroachment in epistemology Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 558-589
  • [3] Fantl J(1956)Good and evil Analysis 17 32-42
  • [4] McGrath M(2008)Knowledge and action Journal of Philosophy 105 571-590
  • [5] Geach PT(1997)Why do we value knowledge? American Philosophical Quarterly 34 423-440
  • [6] Hawthorne J(2007)Reliabilism, stability, and the value of knowledge American Philosophical Quarterly 44 343-355
  • [7] Stanley J(2009)In defence of the conditional probability solution to the swamping problem Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 93-114
  • [8] Jones W(2003)The search for the source of the epistemic good Metaphilosophy 34 12-28
  • [9] Olsson EJ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Olsson EJ(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined