The Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions on the Employment and Functioning of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Nina Nevala
Irmeli Pehkonen
Antti Teittinen
Hannu T. Vesala
Pia Pörtfors
Heidi Anttila
机构
[1] Finnish Institute of Occupational Health,
[2] The Finnish Association On Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities,undefined
[3] National Institute for Health and Welfare,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2019年 / 29卷
关键词
Employment; Intellectual Disability; Developmental Disability; Learning Disability; Rehabilitation; Systematic review; Barriers; Facilitators;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose This systematic review analyzed the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions on the employment and functioning of people with intellectual disabilities (ID), as well as barriers and facilitators of employment. Methods This was a systematic review of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies. The outcomes were employment, transition to the open labor market and functioning. The review included qualitative studies of employment barriers and facilitators. The population comprised people with ID aged 16–68 years. Peer-reviewed articles published in English between January 1990 and February 2019 were obtained from the databases Cinahl, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Eric, Medic, Medline, OTseeker, Pedro, PsycInfo, PubMed, Socindex, and the Web of Science. We also searched Google Scholar and Base. The modified selection instrument (PIOS: participants, intervention, outcome, and study design) used in the selection of the articles depended on the selection criteria. Results Ten quantitative (one randomized controlled, one concurrently controlled, and eight cohort studies), six qualitative studies, one multimethod study, and 21 case studies met the inclusion criteria. The quantitative studies showed that secondary education increases employment among people with ID when it includes work experience and personal support services. Supported employment also increased employment in the open labor market, which sheltered work did not. The barriers to employment were the use of sheltered work, discrimination in vocational experience, the use of class teaching, and deficient work experience while still at school. The facilitators of employment were one’s own activity, the support of one’s family, job coaching, a well-designed work environment, appreciation of one’s work, support form one’s employer and work organization, knowledge and experience of employment during secondary education, and for entrepreneurs, the use of a support person. Conclusions The employment of people with ID can be improved through secondary education including proper teaching methods and personal support services, the use of supported work, workplace accommodations and support from one’s family and employer. These results can be utilized in the development of rehabilitation, education, and the employment of people with ID, to allow them the opportunity to work in the open labor market and participate in society.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 802
页数:29
相关论文
共 235 条
[1]  
Test DW(2000)Longitudinal job satisfaction of persons in supported employment Educ Train Mental Retard Dev Disabil 35 365-373
[2]  
Carver T(2006)What predicts re-employment after job loss for individuals with mental retardation? J Vocat Rehabil 24 183-189
[3]  
Ewers L(2018)How does employment influence health outcomes? A systematic review of the intellectual disability literature J Vocat Rehabil 49 1-13
[4]  
Haddad J(1999)The impact of employment on the quality of life of people with an intellectual disability J Vocat Rehabil 13 95-107
[5]  
Person J(2013)Residential provision for people with intellectual disabilities in England, Wales and Scotland Natl Snapshot Adults Intellect Disabil Labor Force 39 157-165
[6]  
Howarth E(1998)People with an intellectual disability living in an intentional community J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 11 1-14
[7]  
Mann JR(2009)Supported work experience and its impact on young people with intellectual disabilities, their families and employers J Intellect Disabil Res 53 716-726
[8]  
Zhou H(2016)Systematic Review of the Prevalence and Incidence of Intellectual Disabilities: Current Trends and Issues Adv Ment Health Intellect Disabil 10 207-220
[9]  
McDermott S(2016)Prevalence of intellectual disability. A meta-analysis of population-based studies Current Developmental Disorders Reports 3 104-115
[10]  
Butkus S(2011)Life expectance of people with intellectual disability. A 35-year follow-up study Res Dev Disabil 32 419-436