Multi-criteria analysis of Projects' performance in construction

被引:94
作者
Zavadskas, E. K. [1 ]
Vilutiene, T. [1 ]
Turskis, Z. [1 ]
Saparauskas, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Construct Technol & Management, Fac Civil Engn, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
Construction projects; Performance indicators; MCDM; Evaluation; WORK SYSTEMS; ALTERNATIVES; TECHNOLOGY; INDICATORS; ISO-9000; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.acme.2013.07.006
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Construction companies usually perform several construction projects at the same time. Projects differ by complexity, duration, budget, variety of works, and number of implementers. Also vary the results of the projects: some of them have been implemented successfully, other terminated with losses or accidents. To determine the causes of one or another result the analysis of project work flow indicators should be performed. The evaluation of project indicators during implementation is not easy task due to the lack of up to date data and indicators measuring problem. The purpose of the research was to analyze common project management problems, the success factors of construction projects and to illustrate how to assess a projects' execution efficiency by mean of the aggregated indicator in particular company. In case study the problem of project performance indicators selection was analyzed, the aggregated project's performance criterion was determined by applying the methods of multi-criteria analysis and logarithmic normalization method was applied. Results show that by using the aggregated indicators it is easy to compare the projects, the received impartial information is useful for strategic planning, quality management, for solving the tasks of resource allocation, motivational project evaluation. (C) 2013 Politechnika Wroclawska. Published by Elsevier Urban & Partner Sp. z.o.o. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 121
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Research in automated measurement of project performance indicators [J].
Navon, R. .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 16 (02) :176-188
[22]   Assessing research issues in automated project performance control (APPC) [J].
Navon, Ronie ;
Sacks, Rafael .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2007, 16 (04) :474-484
[23]   A DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR ADOPTION OF ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING TOOLS BY SMALL-TO-MEDIUM SIZE CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATIONS [J].
Negahban, Sam S. ;
Baecher, Gregory B. ;
Skibniewski, Miroslaw J. .
JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 18 (02) :253-264
[24]   Large construction projects in developing countries: A case study from Vietnam [J].
Long, Nguyen Duy ;
Ogunlana, Stephen ;
Quang, Truong ;
Lam, Ka Chi .
International Journal of Project Management, 2004, 22 (07) :553-561
[25]   Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method [J].
Pan, Nang-Fei .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 17 (08) :958-965
[26]   Automated construction activity monitoring system [J].
Rebolj, Danijel ;
Babic, Nenad Cus ;
Magdic, Ales ;
Podbreznik, Peter ;
Psunder, Mirko .
ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2008, 22 (04) :493-503
[27]  
Saaty TL., 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-36797-2_9
[28]   The association between ISO 9000 certification and financial performance [J].
Sharma, Divesh S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 2005, 40 (02) :151-172
[29]   Key Assessment Indicators for the Sustainability of Infrastructure Projects [J].
Shen, Liyin ;
Wu, Yuzhe ;
Zhang, Xiaoling .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 137 (06) :441-451
[30]   TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT IN CONSTRUCTION: A CONTINUUM FROM DISTANT PAST INTO THE FUTURE [J].
Skibniewski, Miroslaw J. ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas K. .
JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 19 (01) :136-147