Lung ultrasound in the COVID-19 era: a lesson to be learned for the future

被引:0
作者
Chiara De Molo
Silvia Consolini
Giulia Fiorini
Guido Marzocchi
Mattia Gentilini
Veronica Salvatore
Fabrizio Giostra
Elena Nardi
Francesco Monteduro
Claudio Borghi
Carla Serra
机构
[1] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna,Interventional, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Ultrasound Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences
[2] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna,Emergency Department
[3] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna,U.O. Medicina Interna Cardiovascolare
[4] University of Bologna,Alma Mater Studiorum
[5] IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna,Pediatric and Adult CardioThoracic and Vascular, Oncohematologic and Emergency Radiology Unit
[6] University of Bologna,Cardiovascular Internal Medicine, Department of Surgcal and Medical Sciences
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2023年 / 18卷
关键词
Lung ultrasound; HRCT; COVID-19; Severe acute respiratory syndrome; SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia; Emergency department;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Lung Ultrasound (LUS) is a reliable, radiation free and bedside imaging technique to assess several pulmonary diseases. Although the diagnosis of COVID-19 is made with the nasopharyngeal swab, detection of pulmonary involvement is key for a safe patient management. LUS is a valid alternative to explore, in paucisymptomatic self-presenting patients, the presence and extension of pneumonia compared to High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) that represent the gold standard. This is a single-centre prospective study with 131 patients enrolled. Twelve lung areas were explored reporting a semiquantitative assessment to obtain the LUS score. Each patient performed reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test (rRT-PCR), hemogasanalysis and HRCT. We observed an inverse correlation between LUSs and pO2, P/F, SpO2, AaDO2 (p value < 0.01), a direct correlation with LUSs and AaDO2 (p value < 0.01). Compared with HRCT, LUS showed sensitivity and specificity of 81.8% and 55.4%, respectively, and VPN 75%, VPP 65%. Therefore, LUS can represent an effective alternative tool to detect pulmonary involvement in COVID-19 compared to HRCT.
引用
收藏
页码:2083 / 2091
页数:8
相关论文
共 150 条
[1]  
Chen Y(2015)A sensitive and specific antigen detection assay for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus Emerg Microbes Infect 4 e26-183
[2]  
Chan KH(2014)Serological assays for emerging coronaviruses: challenges and pitfalls Virus Res 194 175-1844
[3]  
Kang Y(2020)Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in different types of clinical specimens JAMA 323 1843-E40
[4]  
Meyer B(2020)Laboratory readiness and response for novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in expert laboratories in 30 EU/EEA countries, January 2020 Euro Surveill 5 2000082-1270
[5]  
Drosten C(2020)Systematic review with meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for COVID-19 Am J Infect Control 296 E32-447
[6]  
Müller MA(2020)Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases Radiology 11 117-365
[7]  
Wang W(2020)Prevalence and risk factors for lung involvement on low-dose chest CT (LDCT) in a paucisymptomatic population of 247 patients affected by COVID-19 Insights Imaging 126 108961-714
[8]  
Xu Y(2020)Diagnosis of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19): rRT-PCR or CT? Eur J Radiol 9 1514-623
[9]  
Gao R(2020)Intensive care risk estimation in COVID-19 pneumonia based on clinical and imaging parameters: experiences from the munich cohort J Clin Med 125 1260-307
[10]  
Lu R(2020)Chest CT in patients with a moderate or high pretest probability of COVID-19 and negative swab Radiol Med 11 205-6