Auditory distraction in school-age children relative to individual differences in working memory capacity

被引:0
作者
Naveen K. Nagaraj
Beula M. Magimairaj
Sarah Schwartz
机构
[1] Utah State University,Cognitive Hearing Science Lab, Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education
[2] Utah State University,Psychology
来源
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2020年 / 82卷
关键词
Auditory distraction; Working memory capacity; Attention; Dichotic listening;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examined susceptibility to auditory distraction and its association to working-memory capacity (WMC) in children (N=125) using a dichotic listening task. Performance in a dichotic listening task was measured with and without distracting multi-talker babble (MTB). Intrusion errors from the to-be-ignored ear and the overall errors of any type between the two conditions were modeled to explain the role of WMC and the potential moderating effect of MTB, while controlling for age. Susceptibility to auditory distraction when represented by the absolute difference in errors between MTB and no-MTB conditions was not associated with WMC and age. That is, children with greater WMC were no better at ignoring interference from babble than children with low WMC. This suggests that irrelevant sounds have obligatory access to verbal short-term memory and are not effectively suppressed by the attention-controlled WM system. However, when ratio of errors with and without MTB was analyzed, children with high WMC made more errors compared to children with low WMC. Developmental improvements in children’s WMC do not appear to advantage listening in the presence of distracting background noise. Therefore, enhancement of target speech in children’s learning environments is crucial.
引用
收藏
页码:3581 / 3593
页数:12
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]  
Barrouillet P(2010)Working Memory and Executive Control: A Time-based Resource-sharing Account Psychologica Belgica 50 353-382
[2]  
Camos V(2015)Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 Journal of Statistical Software 67 1-48
[3]  
Bates D(2004)The irrelevant sound phenomenon revisited: What role for working memory capacity? Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition 30 1106-1118
[4]  
Maechler M(2015)Results from a National Central Auditory Processing Disorder Service: A Real-World Assessment of Diagnostic Practices and Remediation for Central Auditory Processing Disorder Seminars in Hearing 36 216-236
[5]  
Bolker B(2016)Investigating the interaction between dichotic deficits and cognitive abilities using the dichotic digits difference test (DDdT) Part 2 Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 470-9
[6]  
Walker S(1953)Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25 975-979
[7]  
Beaman CP(2007)Individual differences in working memory capacity and divided attention in dichotic listening Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14 699-703
[8]  
Cameron S(1976)Acoustic Masking in Primary Memory Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 15 17-31
[9]  
Glyde H(2001)The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 331-335
[10]  
Dillon H(1980)Individual differences in working memory and reading Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 450-466