Validation of a new urine test for clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Hendriks R.J. [1 ]
Dijkstra S. [1 ]
Cornel E.B. [2 ]
Jannink S.A. [3 ]
de Jong H. [3 ]
Hessels D. [3 ]
Smit F.P. [3 ]
Melchers W.J.G. [1 ,3 ]
Leyten G. [1 ]
de Reijke T.M. [4 ]
Vergunst H. [5 ]
Kil P. [6 ]
Knipscheer B.C. [7 ]
de Kaa C.A.H.-V. [8 ]
Mulders P.F.A. [1 ]
van Oort I.M. [1 ]
Schalken J.A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] afdeling Urologie, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
[2] afdeling Urologie, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo
[3] Research and Development, Noviogendix, Nijmegen
[4] afdeling Urologie, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam
[5] afdeling Urologie, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen
[6] afdeling Urologie, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg
[7] afdeling Urologie, Scheper Ziekenhuis, Emmen
[8] afdeling Pathologie, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
关键词
high-grade; prostate cancer; urine test;
D O I
10.1007/s13629-015-0113-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment there is an urgent need for a test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). In this study a model was developed (using the identified biomarkers HOXC6, DLX1, TDRD1 and HOXC4) for the prediction of high-grade PCa upon prostate biopsy. In two prospective, multicenter studies (cohort A: n = 492; cohort B: n = 371) urine was collected prior to prostate biopsies. Results from cohort A were used to develop a model and validated in the independent cohort B. The HOXC6-DLX1 score resulted in the highest area under the curve of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.71–0.81), with 36 % specificity and 91 % sensitivity. The score was positively correlated with Gleason score. Subgroup analysis confirmed the value for patients with low PSA levels (< 10 ng/ml). The HOXC6-DLX1 score predicts the risk of high-grade PCa upon prostate biopsy. Using this urine test could reduce the amount of unnecessary biopsies, particularly in patients with low serum PSA levels. © 2016, Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Fourcade, Alexandre
    Payrard, Charlotte
    Tissot, Valentin
    Perrouin-Verbe, Marie-Aimee
    Demany, Nicolas
    Serey-Effeil, Sophie
    Callerot, Pierre
    Coquet, Jean-Baptiste
    Doucet, Laurent
    Deruelle, Charles
    Joulin, Vincent
    Nonent, Michel
    Fournier, Georges
    Valeri, Antoine
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (03) : 174 - 179
  • [42] Tyrosine and tryptophan in urine as biomarkers for prostate cancer: A validation study
    Nasimi, Hashmatullah
    Madsen, Jonna Skov
    Zedan, Ahmed H.
    Schmedes, Anne Vibeke
    Malmendal, Anders
    Osther, Palle Jorn Sloth
    Alatraktchi, Fatima AlZahra'a
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 250
  • [43] ProsTAV, a clinically useful test in prostate cancer: an extension study
    Gomez-Gomez, Enrique
    Martinez-Salamanca, Juan Ignacio
    Bianco, Fernando
    Miles, Brian J.
    Burgos, Javier
    Quintas, Juan Justo
    Cano-Castineira, Roque
    Gomez-Ferrer, Alvaro
    Rodriguez-Antolin, Alfredo
    Chechile, Gilberto
    Fernandez, Luis
    Martin, Almudena
    Hidalgo, Paloma
    Parramon, Monica
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [44] Identification and evaluation of clinically significant prostate cancer: a step towards personalized diagnosis
    Ali, Adnan
    Hoyle, Alexander
    Baena, Esther
    Clarke, Noel W.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 217 - 224
  • [45] Pathological consideration of indolent and clinically non-significant prostate cancer definition
    Algaba, Ferran
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2014, 67 (05): : 393 - 399
  • [46] The role of MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Benelli, Andrea
    Vaccaro, Chiara
    Guzzo, Sonia
    Nedbal, Carlotta
    Varca, Virginia
    Gregori, Andrea
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [47] A risk-organised model for clinically significant prostate cancer early detection
    Morote, Juan
    Borque-Fernando, Angel
    Triquell, Marina
    Abascal, Jose M.
    Servian, Pol
    Planas, Jacques
    Mendez, Olga
    Esteban, Luis M.
    Tilla, Enrique
    BJUI COMPASS, 2023, 4 (04): : 420 - 422
  • [48] Risk of clinically significant prostate cancer undercategorized by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Zhu, Wangshu
    Long, Haining
    Yu, Weibin
    Xiong, Yijia
    Fu, Caixia
    Zhao, Jungong
    Liu, Xiaohong
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [49] Is Incidentally Detected Prostate Cancer in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystoprostatectomy Clinically Significant?
    Mazzucchelli, Roberta
    Barbisan, Francesca
    Scarpelli, Marina
    Lopez-Beltran, Antonio
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Cheng, Liang
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2009, 131 (02) : 279 - 283
  • [50] Clinically significant prostate cancer detection on MRI: A radiomic shape features study
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Ponsiglione, Andrea
    Romeo, Valeria
    Verde, Francesco
    Creta, Massimiliano
    La Rocca, Roberto
    Longo, Nicola
    Pace, Leonardo
    Imbriaco, Massimo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 116 : 144 - 149