Validation of a new urine test for clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Hendriks R.J. [1 ]
Dijkstra S. [1 ]
Cornel E.B. [2 ]
Jannink S.A. [3 ]
de Jong H. [3 ]
Hessels D. [3 ]
Smit F.P. [3 ]
Melchers W.J.G. [1 ,3 ]
Leyten G. [1 ]
de Reijke T.M. [4 ]
Vergunst H. [5 ]
Kil P. [6 ]
Knipscheer B.C. [7 ]
de Kaa C.A.H.-V. [8 ]
Mulders P.F.A. [1 ]
van Oort I.M. [1 ]
Schalken J.A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] afdeling Urologie, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
[2] afdeling Urologie, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo
[3] Research and Development, Noviogendix, Nijmegen
[4] afdeling Urologie, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam
[5] afdeling Urologie, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen
[6] afdeling Urologie, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg
[7] afdeling Urologie, Scheper Ziekenhuis, Emmen
[8] afdeling Pathologie, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
关键词
high-grade; prostate cancer; urine test;
D O I
10.1007/s13629-015-0113-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment there is an urgent need for a test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). In this study a model was developed (using the identified biomarkers HOXC6, DLX1, TDRD1 and HOXC4) for the prediction of high-grade PCa upon prostate biopsy. In two prospective, multicenter studies (cohort A: n = 492; cohort B: n = 371) urine was collected prior to prostate biopsies. Results from cohort A were used to develop a model and validated in the independent cohort B. The HOXC6-DLX1 score resulted in the highest area under the curve of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.71–0.81), with 36 % specificity and 91 % sensitivity. The score was positively correlated with Gleason score. Subgroup analysis confirmed the value for patients with low PSA levels (< 10 ng/ml). The HOXC6-DLX1 score predicts the risk of high-grade PCa upon prostate biopsy. Using this urine test could reduce the amount of unnecessary biopsies, particularly in patients with low serum PSA levels. © 2016, Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development and validation of a 25-Gene Panel urine test for prostate cancer diagnosis and potential treatment follow-up
    Heather Johnson
    Jinan Guo
    Xuhui Zhang
    Heqiu Zhang
    Athanasios Simoulis
    Alan H. B. Wu
    Taolin Xia
    Fei Li
    Wanlong Tan
    Allan Johnson
    Nishtman Dizeyi
    Per-Anders Abrahamsson
    Lukas Kenner
    Xiaoyan Feng
    Chang Zou
    Kefeng Xiao
    Jenny L. Persson
    Lingwu Chen
    BMC Medicine, 18
  • [32] Identification and validation of clinically relevant molecular alterations in prostate cancer
    Schlomm, T.
    Sueltmann, H.
    Koellermann, J.
    PATHOLOGE, 2009, 30 (02): : 111 - 116
  • [33] Validation of a 2-gene mRNA urine test for the detection of ≥GG2 prostate cancer in an opportunistic screening population
    Rubio-Briones, Jose
    Borque-Fernando, Angel
    Esteban, Luis M.
    Mascaros, Juan M.
    Ramirez-Backhaus, Miguel
    Casanova, Juan
    Collado, Argimiro
    Mir, Carmen
    Gomez-Ferrer, Alvaro
    Wong, Augusto
    Aragon, Fuensanta
    Calatrava, Ana
    Lopez-Guerrero, Jose A.
    Groskopf, Jack
    Schalken, Jack
    Van Criekinge, Wim
    Dominguez-Escrig, Jose
    PROSTATE, 2020, 80 (06) : 500 - 507
  • [34] Identification and validation of clinically relevant molecular alterations in prostate cancer
    Schlomm, T.
    Sueltmann, H.
    Koellermann, J.
    UROLOGE, 2008, 47 (09): : 1193 - 1198
  • [35] Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Yu Zhang
    Na Zeng
    Yi Chen Zhu
    Yang Xin Rui Huang
    Qiang Guo
    Ye Tian
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 16
  • [36] Epigenetic Signature: A New Player as Predictor of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (PCa) in Patients on Active Surveillance (AS)
    Ferro, Matteo
    Ungaro, Paola
    Cimmino, Amelia
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    Cantiello, Francesco
    Damiano, Rocco
    Terracciano, Daniela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2017, 18 (06)
  • [37] Impact of prostate MRI image quality on diagnostic performance for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa)
    Cheng, Yue
    Zhang, Lei
    Wu, Xiaohui
    Zou, Yi
    Niu, Yao
    Wang, Liang
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (11) : 4113 - 4124
  • [38] Importance of Malignant Core Length in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Transrectal Prostate Biopsies
    Dundar, Gokce
    Erkan, Anil
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2023, 10 (02): : 93 - 100
  • [39] Can transrectal prostate ultrasound compete with multiparametric MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Tam, Joseph
    Loch, Tillmann
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1492 - 1500
  • [40] Clinical Utility of Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Wagaskar, Vinayak G.
    Levy, Micah
    Ratnani, Parita
    Moody, Kate
    Garcia, Mariely
    Pedraza, Adriana M.
    Parekh, Sneha
    Pandav, Krunal
    Shukla, Bhavya
    Prasad, Sonya
    Sobotka, Stanislaw
    Haines, Kenneth, III
    Punnen, Sanoj
    Wiklund, Peter
    Tewari, Ash
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 28 : 9 - 16