Validation of a new urine test for clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Hendriks R.J. [1 ]
Dijkstra S. [1 ]
Cornel E.B. [2 ]
Jannink S.A. [3 ]
de Jong H. [3 ]
Hessels D. [3 ]
Smit F.P. [3 ]
Melchers W.J.G. [1 ,3 ]
Leyten G. [1 ]
de Reijke T.M. [4 ]
Vergunst H. [5 ]
Kil P. [6 ]
Knipscheer B.C. [7 ]
de Kaa C.A.H.-V. [8 ]
Mulders P.F.A. [1 ]
van Oort I.M. [1 ]
Schalken J.A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] afdeling Urologie, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
[2] afdeling Urologie, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo
[3] Research and Development, Noviogendix, Nijmegen
[4] afdeling Urologie, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam
[5] afdeling Urologie, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen
[6] afdeling Urologie, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg
[7] afdeling Urologie, Scheper Ziekenhuis, Emmen
[8] afdeling Pathologie, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
关键词
high-grade; prostate cancer; urine test;
D O I
10.1007/s13629-015-0113-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment there is an urgent need for a test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). In this study a model was developed (using the identified biomarkers HOXC6, DLX1, TDRD1 and HOXC4) for the prediction of high-grade PCa upon prostate biopsy. In two prospective, multicenter studies (cohort A: n = 492; cohort B: n = 371) urine was collected prior to prostate biopsies. Results from cohort A were used to develop a model and validated in the independent cohort B. The HOXC6-DLX1 score resulted in the highest area under the curve of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.71–0.81), with 36 % specificity and 91 % sensitivity. The score was positively correlated with Gleason score. Subgroup analysis confirmed the value for patients with low PSA levels (< 10 ng/ml). The HOXC6-DLX1 score predicts the risk of high-grade PCa upon prostate biopsy. Using this urine test could reduce the amount of unnecessary biopsies, particularly in patients with low serum PSA levels. © 2016, Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seminal citrate is superior to PSA for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Gregorio, Emerson Pereira
    Alexandrino, Antonio Paulo
    Albrecht Schuquel, Ivania Terezinha
    da Costa, Willian Ferreira
    de Freitas Rodrigues, Marco Aurelio
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (06): : 1113 - 1121
  • [22] Is systematic sextant biopsy suitable for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Manseck, A
    Froehner, M
    Oehlschlaeger, S
    Hakenberg, O
    Friedrich, K
    Theissig, F
    Wirth, MP
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2000, 65 (02) : 80 - 83
  • [23] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Ingole, Sarang M.
    Mehta, Rajeev U.
    Kazi, Zubair N.
    Bhuyar, Rutuja, V
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (01) : 65 - 77
  • [24] Evaluation of Weighted Diffusion Subtraction for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Sato, Toshiyuki
    Isoda, Hiroyoshi
    Fujimoto, Koji
    Furuta, Akihiro
    Fujimoto, Masakazu
    Ito, Katsuhiro
    Kobayashi, Takashi
    Nakamoto, Yuji
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (06) : 1979 - 1988
  • [25] The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Delineating Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Chamie, Karim
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Finley, David S.
    Tan, Nelly
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Raman, Steven S.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Reiter, Robert E.
    UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (02) : 369 - 375
  • [26] Utility of dynamic contrast enhancement for clinically significant prostate cancer detection
    Li, Eric V.
    Kumar, Sai K.
    Aguiar, Jonathan A.
    Siddiqui, Mohammad R.
    Neill, Clayton
    Sun, Zequn
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Jawahar, Anugayathri
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Patel, Hiten D.
    BJUI COMPASS, 2024, 5 (09): : 865 - 873
  • [27] Grading Evolution and Contemporary Prognostic Biomarkers of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Sopyllo, Konrad
    Erickson, Andrew M.
    Mirtti, Tuomas
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 21
  • [28] Development and internal validation of PI-RADs v2-based model for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Zhang, Yu
    Zeng, Na
    Zhu, Yi Chen
    Huang, Yang Xin Rui
    Guo, Qiang
    Tian, Ye
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 16
  • [29] New Diagnostic Model for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men With PIRADS 3
    Huang, Chen
    Qiu, Feng
    Jin, Di
    Wei, Xuedong
    Chen, Zongxin
    Wang, Ximing
    Zhao, Xiaojun
    Guo, Linchuan
    Pu, Jinxian
    Hou, Jianquan
    Huang, Yuhua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [30] Development and validation of a 25-Gene Panel urine test for prostate cancer diagnosis and potential treatment follow-up
    Johnson, Heather
    Guo, Jinan
    Zhang, Xuhui
    Zhang, Heqiu
    Simoulis, Athanasios
    Wu, Alan H. B.
    Xia, Taolin
    Li, Fei
    Tan, Wanlong
    Johnson, Allan
    Dizeyi, Nishtman
    Abrahamsson, Per-Anders
    Kenner, Lukas
    Feng, Xiaoyan
    Zou, Chang
    Xiao, Kefeng
    Persson, Jenny L.
    Chen, Lingwu
    BMC MEDICINE, 2020, 18 (01)