Validation of a new urine test for clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Hendriks R.J. [1 ]
Dijkstra S. [1 ]
Cornel E.B. [2 ]
Jannink S.A. [3 ]
de Jong H. [3 ]
Hessels D. [3 ]
Smit F.P. [3 ]
Melchers W.J.G. [1 ,3 ]
Leyten G. [1 ]
de Reijke T.M. [4 ]
Vergunst H. [5 ]
Kil P. [6 ]
Knipscheer B.C. [7 ]
de Kaa C.A.H.-V. [8 ]
Mulders P.F.A. [1 ]
van Oort I.M. [1 ]
Schalken J.A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] afdeling Urologie, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
[2] afdeling Urologie, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo
[3] Research and Development, Noviogendix, Nijmegen
[4] afdeling Urologie, Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam
[5] afdeling Urologie, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen
[6] afdeling Urologie, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg
[7] afdeling Urologie, Scheper Ziekenhuis, Emmen
[8] afdeling Pathologie, Radboudumc, Nijmegen
关键词
high-grade; prostate cancer; urine test;
D O I
10.1007/s13629-015-0113-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment there is an urgent need for a test to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). In this study a model was developed (using the identified biomarkers HOXC6, DLX1, TDRD1 and HOXC4) for the prediction of high-grade PCa upon prostate biopsy. In two prospective, multicenter studies (cohort A: n = 492; cohort B: n = 371) urine was collected prior to prostate biopsies. Results from cohort A were used to develop a model and validated in the independent cohort B. The HOXC6-DLX1 score resulted in the highest area under the curve of 0.76 (95%CI: 0.71–0.81), with 36 % specificity and 91 % sensitivity. The score was positively correlated with Gleason score. Subgroup analysis confirmed the value for patients with low PSA levels (< 10 ng/ml). The HOXC6-DLX1 score predicts the risk of high-grade PCa upon prostate biopsy. Using this urine test could reduce the amount of unnecessary biopsies, particularly in patients with low serum PSA levels. © 2016, Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Serum and urine biomarkers for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer
    Becerra, Maria F.
    Atluri, Venkatasai S.
    Bhattu, Amit S.
    Punnen, Sanoj
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (10) : 686 - 690
  • [2] Development and validation of nomogram to improve the specificity of multiparametric MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer
    Shiekh, Mohsin
    Houenstein, Holly
    Ramahi, Yousuf O. O.
    Shabir, Usma
    Ghadersohi, Sarah
    Zhu, Denzel
    Zhu, Michael
    Jing, Zhe
    Attwood, Kristopher
    Kauffman, Eric
    Aboumohamed, Ahmed
    Guru, Khurshid
    Hussein, Ahmed A. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 876 - 882
  • [3] A urine-based DNA methylation assay, ProCUrE, to identify clinically significant prostate cancer
    Zhao, Fang
    Olkhov-Mitsel, Ekaterina
    Kamdar, Shivani
    Jeyapala, Renu
    Garcia, Julia
    Hurst, Rachel
    Hanna, Marcelino Yazbek
    Mills, Robert
    Tuzova, Alexandra V.
    O'Reilly, Eve
    Kelly, Sarah
    Cooper, Colin
    Brewer, Daniel
    Perry, Antoinette S.
    Clark, Jeremy
    Fleshner, Neil
    Bapat, Bharati
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2018, 10
  • [4] A urine-based DNA methylation assay, ProCUrE, to identify clinically significant prostate cancer
    Fang Zhao
    Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel
    Shivani Kamdar
    Renu Jeyapala
    Julia Garcia
    Rachel Hurst
    Marcelino Yazbek Hanna
    Robert Mills
    Alexandra V. Tuzova
    Eve O’Reilly
    Sarah Kelly
    Colin Cooper
    Daniel Brewer
    Antoinette S. Perry
    Jeremy Clark
    Neil Fleshner
    Bharati Bapat
    Clinical Epigenetics, 2018, 10
  • [5] Prostatectomy-based validation of combined urine and plasma test for predicting high grade prostate cancer
    Albitar, Maher
    Ma, Wanlong
    Lund, Lars
    Shahbaba, Babak
    Uchio, Edward
    Feddersen, Soren
    Moylan, Donald
    Wojno, Kirk
    Shore, Neal
    PROSTATE, 2018, 78 (04) : 294 - 299
  • [6] Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Kryvenko, Oleksandr N.
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (03) : 191 - 197
  • [7] Formalized prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer: is it possible?
    Nguyen, Carvell T.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2012, 14 (03) : 349 - 354
  • [8] Construction and Comparison of Different Models in Detecting Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Zhou, Yongheng
    Qi, Wenqiang
    Cui, Jianfeng
    Zhong, Minglei
    Lv, Guangda
    Qu, Sifeng
    Chen, Shouzhen
    Li, Rongyang
    Shi, Benkang
    Zhu, Yaofeng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [9] Use of the MyProstateScore Test to Rule Out Clinically Significant Cancer: Validation of a Straightforward Clinical Testing Approach
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Morgan, Todd M.
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Tomlins, Scott A.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Siddiqui, Javed
    Kunju, Lakshmi P.
    Botbyl, Rachel
    Chopra, Zoey
    Pandian, Balaji
    Eyrich, Nicholas W.
    Longton, Gary
    Zheng, Yingye
    Palapattu, Ganesh S.
    Wei, John T.
    Niknafs, Yashar S.
    Chinnaiyan, Arul M.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (03) : 732 - 739
  • [10] Prostate Health Index density improves detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Tosoian, Jeffrey J.
    Druskin, Sasha C.
    Andreas, Darian
    Mullane, Patrick
    Chappidi, Meera
    Joo, Sarah
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Mamawala, Mufaddal
    Agostino, Joseph
    Carter, Herbert B.
    Partin, Alan W.
    Sokoll, Lori J.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (06) : 793 - 798