MET2 affects production of hydrogen sulfide during wine fermentation

被引:0
作者
Chien Huang
Miguel Roncoroni
Richard C. Gardner
机构
[1] University of Auckland,Wine Science Group, School of Biological Sciences
来源
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology | 2014年 / 98卷
关键词
Wine yeast; Hydrogen sulfide; Wine aroma; Quantitative trait loci;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The production of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) during yeast fermentation contributes negatively to wine aroma. We have mapped naturally occurring mutations in commercial wine strains that affect production of H2S. A dominant R310G mutant allele of MET2, which encodes homoserine O-acetyltransferase, is present in several wine yeast strains as well as in the main lab strain S288c. Reciprocal hemizygosity and allele swap experiments demonstrated that the MET2R310G allele confers reduced H2S production. Mutations were also identified in genes encoding the two subunits of sulfite reductase, MET5 and MET10, which were associated with reduced H2S production. The most severe of these, an allele of MET10, showed five additional phenotypes: reduced growth rate on sulfate, elevated secretion of sulfite, and reduced production in wine of three volatile sulfur compounds: methionol, carbon disulfide and methylthioacetate. Alleles of MET5 and MET10, but not MET2, affected H2S production measured by colour assays on BiGGY indicator agar, but MET2 effects were seen when bismuth was added to agar plates made with Sauvignon blanc grape juice. Collectively, the data are consistent with the hypothesis that H2S production during wine fermentation results predominantly from enzyme activity in the sulfur assimilation pathway. Lower H2S production results from mutations that reduce the activity of sulfite reductase, the enzyme that produces H2S, or that increase the activity of l-homoserine-O-acetyltransferase, which produces substrate for the next step in the sulfur assimilation pathway.
引用
收藏
页码:7125 / 7135
页数:10
相关论文
共 121 条
  • [1] Brem RB(2002)Genetic dissection of transcriptional regulation in budding yeast Science 296 752-755
  • [2] Yvert G(2003)R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses Bioinformatics 19 889-890
  • [3] Clinton R(1997)When is simple good enough: a comparison of the Gompertz, Baranyi, and three-phase linear models for fitting bacterial growth curves Food Microbiol 14 313-326
  • [4] Kruglyak L(2009)Isolation of sulfite reductase variants of a commercial wine yeast with significantly reduced hydrogen sulfide production FEMS Yeast Res 9 446-459
  • [5] Broman KW(2011)Effects of nitrogen catabolite repression and di-ammonium phosphate addition during wine fermentation by a commercial strain of Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89 1537-1549
  • [6] Wu H(1991)Posttranscriptional regulation of the expression of Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Struct Expr 1089 47-53
  • [7] Sen Ś(1994) gene of Am J Enol Vitic 45 107-112
  • [8] Churchill GA(1996)The effect of nitrogen deficiency and sulfur-containing amino acids on the reduction of sulfate to hydrogen sulfide by wine yeasts J Biotechnol 50 75-87
  • [9] Buchanan RL(1996)Inactivation of Nat Biotechnol 14 1587-1591
  • [10] Whiting RC(2013) in brewer’s yeast increases the level of sulfite in beer Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97 223-235