The Impact of Narrow and Infiltrated Distal Margin After Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer on Patients’ Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Islam H. Metwally
Mohammad Zuhdy
Omar Hamdy
Ahmed M. Fareed
Saleh S. Elbalka
机构
[1] Oncology Center Mansoura University (OCMU),Surgical Oncology department
来源
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
Rectal cancer; Distal margin; Local recurrence; Salvage surgery; Total mesorectal excision;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Rectal cancer is a common tumor within a difficult anatomic constraint. Total mesorectal excision with longitudinal and circumferential free margins is considered imperative for good prognosis. In this article, the authors systematically reviewed all published literature with specific Mesh terms until the end of year 2019. Thereafter, retrieved articles were assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and meta-analysis was conducted comparing local recurrence among 1-cm, 5-mm, and narrow (< 1-mm)/infiltrated margins. Thirty-nine articles were included in the study. Macroscopic distal margin < 1 cm carried a higher incidence of recurrence for those who did not receive neoadjuvant radiation, without affecting neither estimated overall nor disease-free survival. Less than 5-mm margin after radiation therapy is accepted oncologically. Infiltrated margins and narrow margins (< 1 mm) microscopically are associated with higher incidence of local recurrence and shorter overall and disease-free survival. Surgeons should aim at 1-cm safety margin in radiotherapy-naïve patients and microscopic free margin > 1 mm for those who received neoadjuvant therapy. The cost/benefit of reoperation for patients with infiltrated margins is still inadequately studied.
引用
收藏
页码:750 / 760
页数:10
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Zeng WG(2017)A distal resection margin of ≤1 mm and rectal cancer recurrence after sphincter-preserving surgery: the role of a positive distal margin in rectal cancer surgery Dis Colon Rectum 60 1175-1183
[2]  
Manegold P(2019)The minimum distal resection margin in rectal cancer surgery and its impact on local recurrence-a retrospective cohort analysis Int J Surg 69 77-83
[3]  
Bhamre R(2019)Impact of length of distal margin on outcomes following sphincter preserving surgery for middle and lower third rectal cancers Indian J Surg Oncol 10 335-341
[4]  
Hojo K(1986)Anastomotic recurrence after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 29 11-14
[5]  
Kameda K(1990)Proposed distal margin for resection of rectal cancer Jpn J Cancer Res 81 100-104
[6]  
Bujko K(2012)Is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? A systematic review Ann Surg Oncol 19 801-808
[7]  
Kiran RP(2011)Does a subcentimeter distal resection margin adversely influence oncologic outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing restorative proctectomy? Dis Colon Rectum 54 157-163
[8]  
Lian L(2008)Distal bowel surgical margin shorter than 1 cm after preoperative radiation for rectal cancer: is it safe? Ann Surg Oncol 15 3124-3131
[9]  
Lavery IC(2010)Distal margins in radical resections for rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy: how short is long enough? Dig Surg 27 185-189
[10]  
Rutkowski A(2014)Depth and lateral spread of microscopic residual rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: implications for treatment decisions Colorectal Dis 16 610-615