Negative numbers eliminate, but do not reverse, the attentional SNARC effect

被引:0
作者
Michael D. Dodd
机构
[1] University of Nebraska-Lincoln,Department of Psychology
来源
Psychological Research | 2011年 / 75卷
关键词
Stimulus Onset Asynchrony; Target Detection; Spatial Attention; Negative Number; Mental Number Line;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Three experiments are reported examining whether the presentation of irrelevant negative numbers at central fixation interacts with attentional orienting beyond fixation. It has been previously shown that number perception influences spatial attention, with the presentation of spatially nonpredictive numbers resulting in the allocation of attention to the left when the number is low (e.g., 1 or 2) and to the right when the number is high (e.g., 8 or 9). In the present experiment, it is examined whether this attentional spatial numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect is influenced by the presentation of negative numbers, which should have spatial properties that are in direct opposition to their positive counterparts (e.g., −1 or −2 would be considered high numbers relative to −8 or −9, which would be considered low numbers). Though the presentation of negative numbers does not lead to a reversal of the attentional SNARC effect, it does lead to an elimination of the effect, providing insight into how the attentional SNARC effect develops.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 9
页数:7
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Bächtold D(1998)Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space Neuropsychologia 36 731-735
[2]  
Baumüller M(2009)Beyond the number domain Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13 83-91
[3]  
Brugger P(2007)Temporal order judgment reveals how number magnitude affects visuospatial attention Cognition 102 101-117
[4]  
Cantlon JF(2008)Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation Progress in Neurobiology 84 132-147
[5]  
Platt ML(1993)The mental representation of parity and number magnitude Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122 371-396
[6]  
Brannon EM(2008)Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways) Cognition 108 810-818
[7]  
Casarotti M.(2009)Training attention: Interactions between central cues and reflexive attention Visual Cognition 17 736-754
[8]  
Michielin M.(1997)Uninformative symbolic cues may bias visual-spatial attention: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence Biological Psychology 46 67-71
[9]  
Zorzi M.(2001)Number processing induces spatial performance biases Neurology 57 822-826
[10]  
Umilta C.(2003)Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention Nature Neuroscience 6 555-556