Validation of knowledge and adherence assessment tools among patients on warfarin therapy in a Saudi hospital anticoagulant clinic

被引:0
作者
Sireen Abdul Rahim Shilbayeh
Wejdan Ali Almutairi
Sarah Ahmed Alyahya
Nouf Hayef Alshammari
Eiad Shaheen
Alya Adam
机构
[1] Pharmacy College Princess Nourah bint Abdul Rahman University,Department of Pharmacy Practice,
来源
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | 2018年 / 40卷
关键词
Anticoagulation; Patient adherence; Patient knowledge; Reliability; Saudi Arabia; Validity; Warfarin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background Although it can result in serious complications due to its narrow therapeutic index, warfarin is widely used in the treatment and prevention of thromboembolic disorders. However, patients’ adherence and knowledge are determinants of therapeutic success. Objective We sought to validate instruments to provide a reliable means of identifying gaps in patient understanding and nonadherence to inform targeted pharmacists’ interventions to improve these measures. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Patients’ knowledge about warfarin was rated using an Arabic-language tool. Medication adherence was assessed using the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). The international normalized ratio (INR) control was quantified by the Rosendaal Method. Setting At the Security Forces hospital anticoagulant clinic (ACC), Riyadh. Main outcome measure Validity of a Knowledge and adherence tool. Results Totally, 101 patients completed the questionnaires. Interestingly, the knowledge tool demonstrated good internal consistency (total Cronbach’s alpha = 0.75) and significant concurrent validity with adherence levels. Fifty-two patients were classified as having unsatisfactory knowledge. Deficiency in knowledge was most obvious with respect to the consequences of missing a dose and when to seek immediate medical attention. The MMAS-8 had moderate reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.65); however, its concurrent validity with good INR control was not demonstrated. Conclusions This study revealed high prevalence of nonadherence and poor knowledge in the population visiting the ACC. Given that available knowledge and adherence tools seemed to have little validity in predicting clinical outcomes, structured tools should be designed, considering progression in clinical outcomes with future pharmacists’ interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 66
页数:10
相关论文
共 176 条
[31]  
Barrera V(2005)Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients J Thromb Haemost 3 692-155
[32]  
de Miguel G(2001)Oral Anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range Chest 119 8S-49
[33]  
Jiménez-García R(2016)Adequate time in therapeutic INR range using triple antithrombotic therapy is not associated with long-term cardiovascular events and major bleeding complications after drug-eluting stent implantation J Cardiol 68 517-636
[34]  
Sudlow C(1993)A Method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy Thromb Haemost 69 236-554
[35]  
Rodgers H(2009)Measuring Quality of Oral Anticoagulation care: extending quality measurement to a new field Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 35 146-142
[36]  
Kenny R(2016)Advantages of a warfarin protocol for long-term care pharmacists: a retrospective cohort study Can Geriatr J 19 40-1086
[37]  
Thomson R(2008)Quality of anticoagulation and use of warfarin-interacting medications in long-term care: a chart review BMC Geriatr 8 13-974
[38]  
Taylor F(2005)Impact of adherence, knowledge, and quality of life on anticoagulation control Ann Pharmacother 39 632-235
[39]  
Ramsay M(2009)Constant use of oral anticoagulants: implications in the control of their adequate levels Arq Bras Cardiol 93 549-445
[40]  
Renton A(2011)INR Goal attainment and oral anticoagulation knowledge of patients enrolled in an anticoagulation clinic in a veterans affairs medical center J Manag Care Pharm 17 133-482