Osmotic shock improves Tnt1 transposition frequency in Medicago truncatula cv Jemalong during in vitro regeneration

被引:0
作者
Anelia Iantcheva
Mireille Chabaud
Viviane Cosson
Marielle Barascud
Bernadette Schutz
Catherine Primard-Brisset
Patricia Durand
David G. Barker
Mariana Vlahova
Pascal Ratet
机构
[1] AgroBioInstitute,Laboratory of Plant
[2] Institut National de Recherche Agronomique-Centre National de Recherche Scientifique 441/2594,Microbe Interactions, Unité Mixte de Recherche
[3] Institut des Sciences Végétales,undefined
[4] Centre National de Recherche Scientifique,undefined
来源
Plant Cell Reports | 2009年 / 28卷
关键词
Retrotransposon; Somatic embryogenesis; Improved regeneration; Insertional mutagenesis; Model legume;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Insertion mutant collections are powerful tools for genetic studies in plants. Although large-scale insertional mutagenesis using T-DNA is not feasible in legumes, the Tnt1 tobacco retrotransposon can be used as a very efficient mutagen in the Medicago truncatula R108 genotype. In this article, we show that Tnt1 can also be exploited to create insertional mutants via transformation and/or regeneration in the reference cultivar Jemalong. Tnt1 insertional mutagenesis in Jemalong following Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation was found to be very efficient, with an average of greater than 15 insertions/line. In contrast, regeneration using low-copy transgenic starter lines resulted in a highly variable rate of new Tnt1 insertions. With the goal of increasing the number of additional Tnt1 insertions during regeneration of starter lines, we have compared the insertion frequencies for a number of different regeneration protocols. In addition, we have been able to show that sucrose-mediated osmotic shock preceding regeneration significantly increases the transposition frequency. Under optimal conditions, 95% of the regenerated Jemalong plants possess new insertions.
引用
收藏
页码:1563 / 1572
页数:9
相关论文
共 120 条
[1]  
Benlloch R(2006)Isolation of Plant Physiol 142 972-983
[2]  
d’Erfurth I(1996) proves Plant Cell Rep 15 305-310
[3]  
Ferrandiz C(2003) a useful reverse genetics tool in Plant Cell Rep 22 46-51
[4]  
Cosson V(2006) and uncovers new aspects of Methods Mol Biol 343 115-127
[5]  
Pío Beltrán J(2001)-like functions in legumes Mol Genet Genomics 265 32-42
[6]  
Cañas LA(2003)Transformation of barrel medic ( Plant J 34 95-106
[7]  
Kondorosi A(1983) Gaertn.) by Plant Mol Biol Rep 1 19-21
[8]  
Madueño F(1968) and regeneration via somatic embryogenesis of transgenic plants with the Exp Cell Res 50 151-158
[9]  
Ratet P(1993)12 nodulin promoter fused to the Transgenic Res 2 208-218
[10]  
Chabaud M(1999) reporter gene Plant Cell Rep 18 904-910