The experience of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective case series

被引:0
作者
Xizhi Wen
Ya Ding
Jingjing Li
Jingjing Zhao
Ruiqing Peng
Dandan Li
Baoyan Zhu
Yao Wang
Xing Zhang
Xiaoshi Zhang
机构
[1] Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Biotherapy Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine
来源
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | 2017年 / 66卷
关键词
Ipilimumab; Pembrolizumab; Chinese patients; Acral melanoma; Mucosal melanoma; Biomarkers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Melanomas in Chinese patients show relatively higher rates of acral and mucosal types than in other populations. However, the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor therapies against these melanoma subtypes is not well defined. We analyzed 52 patients treated with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, or a combination of both to evaluate the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma, particularly those with acral and mucosal types. The objective response rates (ORRs) were 0, 25, and 20% for ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab, respectively. Pembrolizumab contained therapy was as effective in acral and mucosal melanoma patients (ORR 26.7 and 20%, respectively) as in non-acral cutaneous melanoma patients (ORR 26.7%). Baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels and relative lymphocyte counts were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. The incidences of grade 3–4 adverse events were 14% in the two monotherapy groups and 30% in the combined therapy group. The most frequent adverse events were elevation of aminotransferase, skin toxicity, thyroid dysfunction, pyrexia, and fatigue. Treatment-related rash or vitiligo was associated with a better prognosis. In summary, pembrolizumab-based therapy resulted in meaningful efficacy and good tolerability in Chinese patients with melanoma, including those with acral and mucosal types.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1162
页数:9
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]  
Garbe C(2011)Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects Oncologist 16 5-24
[2]  
Eigentler TK(2015)Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumabin unresectable or metastatic melanoma J ClinOncol 33 1889-1894
[3]  
Keilholz U(2013)Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma N Engl J Med 369 134-144
[4]  
Hauschild A(2014)Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab J ClinOncol 32 1020-1030
[5]  
Kirkwood JM(2013)Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma N Engl J Med 369 122-133
[6]  
Schadendorf D(2015)Combined nivolumaband ipilimumabor monotherapy in untreated melanoma N Engl J Med 373 23-34
[7]  
Hodi FS(2016)Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus ipilimumab (ipi) for advanced melanoma: Results of the KEYNOTE-029 expansion cohort J ClinOncol 34 9506-2147
[8]  
Robert C(2011)Clinical presentation, histology, and prognoses of malignant melanoma in ethnic Chinese: a study of 522 consecutive cases BMC Cancer 11 85-269
[9]  
Weber JS(2005)Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma N Engl J Med 353 2135-838
[10]  
Margolin K(2013)Genome sequencing of mucosal melanomas reveals that they are driven by distinct mechanisms from cutaneous melanoma J Pathol 230 261-3362